Let me get this right. Shareholders, who own the position, would rather NOT vote or vote NOT to extend the merger and see their investment liquidate at $10 at, in some cases, a massive loss. When instead they could have sold the position at breakeven, today's price or prior at a higher price at a gain. Is that where your logic takes you?

What is more likely the case is that there is big money who do not want to see this succeed and as a result have previously purchased a large amount of shares and are either abstaining or voting no. These scum are treating their positions and investment as a way to lose LESS in the future both monetarily and more importantly politically. They will take a loss now, wright it off on their taxes, in order to make sure that they don't see a company be successful that would help bring an end to their dynasty.

But what trips me out about your and your buddies comments is that your stupidity blinds you to how easy you are to pick out from a crowd. You quote a valid comment then begin to tell us:

"That has nothing at all to do with the fact that DWAC cannot get its own shareholders to vote in favor.

Like ... WTF?"

But fail to even validate your comment by giving us what does have to do with the vote problem even if you had a theory to begin with. Typical libtard speak. You have to understand that that kind of rationalization only works in your world because everyone else is like you (libtards). That crap doesn't work around here.

Kick rocks chump and go back to reddit.