This is accurate. It matches the Bloomberg realtime province data that I watched for 3 hours yesterday. Note that the areas controlled by criminals and gangs are the ones where the rigging is most prevalent. One of the provinces was cheating especially hard with almost 77% of the vote in favor of Lula. [Nordeste = Northeast part of the country]
From my election data analysis from US the last 6 years or so, it appears that in a 2-person race any numbers above about 2/3 (66%) in favor of one candidate indicates cheating of some kind. Once you hit 70%, the probability of cheating goes up dramatically, and over 75% it rapidly approaches 100% probability. How H&S works: https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6utnYcF/
They are either too dumb to realize or just don't care and throw it in our faces that they are obviously cheating and there is nothing we can do about it.
This is accurate. It matches the Bloomberg realtime province data that I watched for 3 hours yesterday. Note that the areas controlled by criminals and gangs are the ones where the rigging is most prevalent. One of the provinces was cheating especially hard with almost 77% of the vote in favor of Lula. [Nordeste = Northeast part of the country]
From my election data analysis from US the last 6 years or so, it appears that in a 2-person race any numbers above about 2/3 (66%) in favor of one candidate indicates cheating of some kind. Once you hit 70%, the probability of cheating goes up dramatically, and over 75% it rapidly approaches 100% probability. How H&S works: https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6utnYcF/
They are either too dumb to realize or just don't care and throw it in our faces that they are obviously cheating and there is nothing we can do about it.