I didn't imply anything. I presented the two options: you are either for Q or you are not. It's up to you to decide which one you are, personally.
What happens in Brazil is up to the people of Brazil to decide. They are a sovereign country, after all.
And, yes, it is theoretically possible that we could "be in the same boat." However, civil war is not the answer, as this is precisely what the DS is salivating over. I, for one, will not give the DS what they want. There is always more than one solution to a problem. Don't limit your thinking.
I don't think civil war is necessarily the answer in our case either. However, my original question was an open and a reasonable one: at what point might civil war be preferable to subjugation to tyrants? Any mature person should be able to entertain and have such a discussion without trying to shut down questions.
I didn't imply anything. I presented the two options: you are either for Q or you are not. It's up to you to decide which one you are, personally.
What happens in Brazil is up to the people of Brazil to decide. They are a sovereign country, after all.
And, yes, it is theoretically possible that we could "be in the same boat." However, civil war is not the answer, as this is precisely what the DS is salivating over. I, for one, will not give the DS what they want. There is always more than one solution to a problem. Don't limit your thinking.
I don't think civil war is necessarily the answer in our case either. However, my original question was an open and a reasonable one: at what point might civil war be preferable to subjugation to tyrants? Any mature person should be able to entertain and have such a discussion without trying to shut down questions.
"...at what point might civil war be preferable to subjugation to tyrants?"
When every last avenue for peace has been extinguished...and not before then.
Okay fair enough, I appreciate you for answering my question.
And, thank you for keeping the conversation civil. May it serve as an example to others.