If there exist really "our side" (white hats) and there are really white hats Elon DEFINITELY IS on our side,but he WAS on their side.
DEFECTOR - that's the correct word to describe it probably in English (I am not English native speaker,so correct me if I am wrong). Or maybe other term: "crown witness".
Thing with the sink looked very convincing. Not all Q research look valid enough for me (multiple confirmation at once is good,others can be mistakes),but those one with sink looked quite convincing. Willingly or not - probably mr Musk is working with the Q team.
Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.
Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit,
and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?
I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.
But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here
Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...
I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".
Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer" I say I am anon like you,but you shouldn't blindly trust anybody who says that)
Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.
Most people here trust Q and think easiest explaination is the best,and those easiest one looks like there could be indeed "white hats" on our side. At least situation with "covid scare" is being getting to normal,lockdowns look ending,so if there are white hats and it isn't some trick - I am grateful for that thing. Hope there are white hats,because if not we would be in very deep and stinky shit.
I agree that they shouldn't be phrased as claims. I think they should be framed as theories. I think there's plenty of evidence that the guy is on our side. Doesn't mean he is, but you don't think that the fact that he thumbs his nose at the Deep State, seems hated by the Deep State, just apparently wrested control of Twitter from the Deep State (even though he MIGHT still be Deep State) is evidence that he just might be on our side? Again, he might not, but there sure seems to be a lot of evidence for it. Do you not agree?
u/KimJung-Un & u/purkiss80
If there exist really "our side" (white hats) and there are really white hats Elon DEFINITELY IS on our side,but he WAS on their side.
DEFECTOR - that's the correct word to describe it probably in English (I am not English native speaker,so correct me if I am wrong). Or maybe other term: "crown witness".
Thing with the sink looked very convincing. Not all Q research look valid enough for me (multiple confirmation at once is good,others can be mistakes),but those one with sink looked quite convincing. Willingly or not - probably mr Musk is working with the Q team.
All these claims that he's on our side. Based on what?
Based on the fact he is doing some things which could be highly considered Q proofs here.
Come on, whole our side thing is because we believe in Q proofs being legit, and not being some kind of cabal manipulation over us - isn't it?
I would like conclusive 100% undeniable proof about operation being legit to throw it to normies to make them see it or if not to be calm everything will be all right at the end. I have my doubts about Q too,I never were hiding it.
But we don't have conclusive undeniable proofs now.We don't have conclusive undeniable leaks who is who.Sorry.All we really have are our guesswork,Q posts and incidents looking highly related to Q posts,things we call "Q proofs" here
Looking at things we have it is highly probable Musk can be defactor if Q is legit. Is that true ? I don't know. I'm not even 100% sure Q is reliable or not about military doing the job. Q is reliable about cabal,but we would notice it probably alone and that would lead people on the streets in "uncontrollable way". Is that really good thing or bad - and for whom ? I don't know for sure...
I got interesting material from u/Jacobin on conspiracies win. Article by Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule: "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures".
Are they using Q ? Or maybe you shall suspect me I am spreading doubts ? (Yes,you shouldn't trust me too - "paranoid" means "safer" I say I am anon like you,but you shouldn't blindly trust anybody who says that)
Q team can be against cabal - or against us (and in such case being part of cabal). We will see how situation will develop.
Most people here trust Q and think easiest explaination is the best,and those easiest one looks like there could be indeed "white hats" on our side. At least situation with "covid scare" is being getting to normal,lockdowns look ending,so if there are white hats and it isn't some trick - I am grateful for that thing. Hope there are white hats,because if not we would be in very deep and stinky shit.
I agree that they shouldn't be phrased as claims. I think they should be framed as theories. I think there's plenty of evidence that the guy is on our side. Doesn't mean he is, but you don't think that the fact that he thumbs his nose at the Deep State, seems hated by the Deep State, just apparently wrested control of Twitter from the Deep State (even though he MIGHT still be Deep State) is evidence that he just might be on our side? Again, he might not, but there sure seems to be a lot of evidence for it. Do you not agree?
I do not agree. I think there is -zero- evidence he is on our side. I don't think he's hated by the Deep State.