Agreed. It’s very sad and shocking. As a bestselling writer, she should really be ashamed for writing improper English. How vulgar of her to write a double negative.
Thank you for the correct apostrophe ve, rather than the wrong word 'of'. I cringe every time I see, could 'of', would 'of', should 'of'! It's the word 'have' or the contraction 've. C'mon people, don't they teach English anymore? Oh wait...... 🙄
Agreed. It’s very sad and shocking. As a bestselling writer, she should really be ashamed for writing improper English. How vulgar of her to write a double negative.
Ha! She should know ain't ain't a word!
Edit: should've known*
Thank you for the correct apostrophe ve, rather than the wrong word 'of'. I cringe every time I see, could 'of', would 'of', should 'of'! It's the word 'have' or the contraction 've. C'mon people, don't they teach English anymore? Oh wait...... 🙄
Agree. Correct grammar is struggling these days, but a lot don't realize (or haven't be taught) the importance of how it conveys what they are trying to communicate. Take for example someone writing "Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less if were heading to Deathcon won" and being taken seriously. I hear someone say 'irregardless' at least once a day in my place of employment and I work alongside aeronautical engineers. I also think texting and spellchecker has made most lazy or blasé about the quality of their messaging - even in so-called professional publications. Our local paper here is festooned in the most basic errors and it is really disappointing.
Everything you said is so right!
English?
Hahaha! Kind of reminds me of my kid when he was just learning to talk and he told me to 'unmute' the tv! 😄
🤣🤣🤣
If she actually wrote that book. Remember who we’re dealing with. Masters of deception