I never thought I'd enjoy Fact checkers 👀😎
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Hence my saying that there are things to question in the tweet, such as the "we", but what the Twitter fact-checker is going after is silly, and makes the entire exercise seem silly. Which could be the point! Destroy any faith in the fact-check system by just repeatedly breaking it until everyone is glad to see it go.
Could be . . . I just think it's way past time to just continue allowing the White House poseurs to lie to the country with no repercussions.
Forcing them to backtrack, and ultimately stop doing this at all, is very important.
Then you should want a fact-check that actually makes sense, actually checks facts and exposes lies, and doesn't make the fact-checking apparatus seem silly and broken.
I get that you like fact-checking being used against a guy you don't like, but it's not a victory of it's a bad fact-check that makes the fact-checkers seem disconnected and make Biden seem hinged by comparison.
Are you selling the weed you're smoking?
So Braindead Joe is just "a guy I don't like" and not a life-long corrupt pervert who is a globo-libtard puppet who has given away billions of our tax dollars and destroyed this country while continuing Obummer's separatist campaign, while lying constantly to the American citizens???
If you think Biden could EVER "seem hinged," you are in the wrong place.
Seeming hinged is not the same as seeming hinged to you. You have to remember that millions of voters disagree with you, and the way you see the world is not universal. You have to remember this if you ever want to affect the kind of change you want to see.
My point was that it's a bad fact-check that makes fact-checking look bad and Biden look good and put-upon by comparison. You don't have to agree that it looks that way to you or that that is reality - I am trying to warn y'all how normies can interpret this. But whatevs