IIRC the framework of a tower like those would likely survive a normal explosive anyway. Even targeted explosives. It would need some serious focus (probably) to bring it down, as in a willful act.
Steel could melt as people have pointed out many times, not by the jet fuel but by the friction and speed of impact, and all it would need is a brief moment of such high temperatures.
But that doesn't explain the fall looking like target demolitions. If there were, say, 8 beams making the bulk of the support framework (arbitrary) and two of them melted, it would fall lopsided and much more sloppily.
I truly hope one day we get the unaltered truth of that moment. It was that moment, of moments, where we descended down this tyrannical road and our government reached for power beyond what the Constitution allots, and they haven't stopped reaching.
Hell, the first attempt in the 90's. Trump himself said in an interview right after 9/11 said that he went down there and half the support columns were missing from the truck explosion, but it was still standing.
Even as a teenager who bought into it "just being a terrorist attack" at the time the way the towers collapsed still bothered me on a subconscious level.
somebody did the math to determine how much energy would be needed to turn that much steel and concrete and furnishings into dust before it could hit the ground. they concluded the buildings would need to be constructed mostly from explosives in order to achieve this. not to mention the dust cloud from this effect would be pyroclastic (but it clearly wasn't on that day as nobody was burned by it). what we witnessed (and the world at large witnessed) that day was a demonstration of exotic weapons technology. I like to call it the Jewish Space Laser. Many people think that is antisemitic, regardless of its truthfulness.
IIRC the framework of a tower like those would likely survive a normal explosive anyway. Even targeted explosives. It would need some serious focus (probably) to bring it down, as in a willful act.
Steel could melt as people have pointed out many times, not by the jet fuel but by the friction and speed of impact, and all it would need is a brief moment of such high temperatures.
But that doesn't explain the fall looking like target demolitions. If there were, say, 8 beams making the bulk of the support framework (arbitrary) and two of them melted, it would fall lopsided and much more sloppily.
I truly hope one day we get the unaltered truth of that moment. It was that moment, of moments, where we descended down this tyrannical road and our government reached for power beyond what the Constitution allots, and they haven't stopped reaching.
Hell, the first attempt in the 90's. Trump himself said in an interview right after 9/11 said that he went down there and half the support columns were missing from the truck explosion, but it was still standing.
Even as a teenager who bought into it "just being a terrorist attack" at the time the way the towers collapsed still bothered me on a subconscious level.
Search for Judy Wood.
somebody did the math to determine how much energy would be needed to turn that much steel and concrete and furnishings into dust before it could hit the ground. they concluded the buildings would need to be constructed mostly from explosives in order to achieve this. not to mention the dust cloud from this effect would be pyroclastic (but it clearly wasn't on that day as nobody was burned by it). what we witnessed (and the world at large witnessed) that day was a demonstration of exotic weapons technology. I like to call it the Jewish Space Laser. Many people think that is antisemitic, regardless of its truthfulness.