Can I get help from another Kentuckian on amendment 2. All these Facebook warriors are talking about how voting yes means NO ABORTION EVER even in case of medical emergency, threat to life, eptopic, etc. Ive assumed its a scare tactic for the younger women but I'm not doing good research i guess. Id assume this isnt the case, ya?
I feel like a retard because i cant find what im looking for. Im all for banning abortion but what about the things I listed above. Im tired of all these girls posting about how if you habe an ectopic pregnancy, you cant get treatment. That doesnt even seem logically since, as far as I know, and ectopic situation isnt viable and is only a threat to the womans life (?)
Not a Kentuckian but I assume (you know what they say about assumptions though) that the procedure will always be to try and save both, but sometimes the baby is lost to save the mother.
This is different than aborting, as the baby died as a consequence and not as the intention.
Health/life of the mother has been perverted to mean mental health including depression in order to pump these numbers up.
The number of people with complications that would be prevented through abortion are extremely small, and so policy is most likely not intending to protect that specific circumstance, but that does not preclude that circumstance from being adequately handled during emergencies.
Hopefully you get your concerns assuaged by an actual Kentuckian who can check that though. MI is in a similar boat, which is funny since abortion has technically not been legal here but the federal government stepped on us.
I can't speak for Kentucky, but for things like ectopic pregnancy, it's not an abortion. It's a completely different procedure. Report them for false information.
From what I have found, this is not about banning abortions, simply putting an amendment to the Kentucky State Constitution that there is no Right to abortion, ergo laws and legislation can place limits and restraints on abortions. This will place limitations on any State funding that would have to go into paying for abortions. The reeeing is ridiculous. They are making up the nonsense about not allowing abortions for any reason. They can put in place restrictions later on, but they are just making the case that this is not a Constitutional Right.
I have read that the mother is hardly ever at risk of dying nowadays. In the past, job one was to save the baby regardless. I suppose the idea was that the baby might become the one to cure cancer or do something else great. Of course, they would try to save both if they could.
In the case of rape, there are millions of couples who would love to adopt babies.
Can I get help from another Kentuckian on amendment 2. All these Facebook warriors are talking about how voting yes means NO ABORTION EVER even in case of medical emergency, threat to life, eptopic, etc. Ive assumed its a scare tactic for the younger women but I'm not doing good research i guess. Id assume this isnt the case, ya?
I feel like a retard because i cant find what im looking for. Im all for banning abortion but what about the things I listed above. Im tired of all these girls posting about how if you habe an ectopic pregnancy, you cant get treatment. That doesnt even seem logically since, as far as I know, and ectopic situation isnt viable and is only a threat to the womans life (?)
Not a Kentuckian but I assume (you know what they say about assumptions though) that the procedure will always be to try and save both, but sometimes the baby is lost to save the mother.
This is different than aborting, as the baby died as a consequence and not as the intention.
Health/life of the mother has been perverted to mean mental health including depression in order to pump these numbers up.
The number of people with complications that would be prevented through abortion are extremely small, and so policy is most likely not intending to protect that specific circumstance, but that does not preclude that circumstance from being adequately handled during emergencies.
Hopefully you get your concerns assuaged by an actual Kentuckian who can check that though. MI is in a similar boat, which is funny since abortion has technically not been legal here but the federal government stepped on us.
Does help with context thank you. Ill have time to sit down tonight and read. Should
I can't speak for Kentucky, but for things like ectopic pregnancy, it's not an abortion. It's a completely different procedure. Report them for false information.
https://www.hli.org/resources/ectopic-pregnancy-and-abortion/
https://news.ballotpedia.org/2021/03/31/kentucky-voters-will-decide-an-amendment-in-2022-saying-there-is-no-right-to-abortion-in-the-state-constitution/
From what I have found, this is not about banning abortions, simply putting an amendment to the Kentucky State Constitution that there is no Right to abortion, ergo laws and legislation can place limits and restraints on abortions. This will place limitations on any State funding that would have to go into paying for abortions. The reeeing is ridiculous. They are making up the nonsense about not allowing abortions for any reason. They can put in place restrictions later on, but they are just making the case that this is not a Constitutional Right.
I have read that the mother is hardly ever at risk of dying nowadays. In the past, job one was to save the baby regardless. I suppose the idea was that the baby might become the one to cure cancer or do something else great. Of course, they would try to save both if they could.
In the case of rape, there are millions of couples who would love to adopt babies.
Thats what ive come to understand too, thank you.