That makes zero sense. The plaintiff should have no role in deciding if the defendant is in contempt of court. And, it doesn’t really follow that they are being compelled to divulge their source of information. The only thing that should matter in a court of law is if their claims are true.
If I have followed this correctly I’m also not understanding why Gregg and Catherine can’t or don’t use the simple fact that their knowledge of Kinnech was gained through participation in a Federal Investigation.
Its my guess that when the FBI turned on them that was due to some higher up knowing their ass was in a sling. And all we see platlying out is the FBI interfering so they can get the intel they need to silence whoever has info on them.
That makes zero sense. The plaintiff should have no role in deciding if the defendant is in contempt of court. And, it doesn’t really follow that they are being compelled to divulge their source of information. The only thing that should matter in a court of law is if their claims are true.
If I have followed this correctly I’m also not understanding why Gregg and Catherine can’t or don’t use the simple fact that their knowledge of Kinnech was gained through participation in a Federal Investigation.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65339680/konnech-inc-v-true-the-vote-inc/
Whoever posted this on Gregg's account is lying.
Even if the order was sealed it would show up here as a sealed order.
Its my guess that when the FBI turned on them that was due to some higher up knowing their ass was in a sling. And all we see platlying out is the FBI interfering so they can get the intel they need to silence whoever has info on them.