I believe the real reason people have their newborns sons circumcised is because a group of people need access to foreskin? I really don't understand why this procedure is common place.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (154)
sorted by:
Kellogg, same fellow who made breakfast cereal, did much of what he did to keep people "chaste" because it reduced sexual pleasure (though it arguably doesn't according to studies https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23937309/).
Kellogg is a Scottish name. He was a white 7th day adventist.
Circumcision is common in the US (over 71% of males) and it's been that way for well over a century.
I'd say the bulk majority of those who push the issue here on GAW imply evil Jews are out there brow-beating white men into submission to get their children circumcised. They are unhinged history revisionists.
I don't see that mentioned enough
I think it's the difference between pleasure and sensation. If a circumcised and an uncircumsized guy are both getting a BJ they're both gonna be at 100% pleasure, just one might have more sensation than the other