It would seem that the implication by way of the allusion is quite obvious if you know the famous scene from the movie... it is foolish to be prematurely overconfident in one's judgement that they have outwitted somebody who has in fact, already outwitted them.
Man in black: You're that smart?
Vizzini: Let me put it this way: Have you ever heard or Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?
Man in black: Yes.
Vizzini: Morons!
Man in black: Really! In that case, I challenge you to a battle of wits.
More simply and directly put, it would seem that CHAOS is merely suggesting that your assessment about the legitimacy of this Q post, is wrong.
It seems there is much disagreement over this matter, being discussed by numerous posters here...
It would seem that the implication by way of the allusion is quite obvious if you know the famous scene from the movie... it is foolish to be prematurely overconfident in one's judgement that they have outwitted somebody who has in fact, already outwitted them.
More simply and directly put, it would seem that CHAOS is merely suggesting that your assessment about the legitimacy of this Q post, is wrong.
It seems there is much disagreement over this matter, being discussed by numerous posters here...