I don't understand this line of thinking. We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
The nature of Q posts changed a lot, as if more than one personality. The comment above that there was too much data than needed. Q posted some very long posts with lots of info. in them. The trip code is correct
I agree. This post has only two declarative sentences. The rest are questions. I don't grasp the logic of "Oh, this can't be Q. He isn't telling us 'not enough'." How can he tell us anything new, if we insist that it not deviate from the past? I think somebody wants to take a ride in a time machine, "back to the Good Old Q Posts" when we were all watching a movie, and could argue about when/if the Storm would happen!
I don't understand this line of thinking. We have so many newbies. These comms are for them. They are to excite and make them feel part of this mission now. You are no longer the primary audience. Anyone you have tried to reach has either believed you or flat out rejected you at this point. Newbies are our best shot for sharing this with people within their spheres. We have a seasoned member of this board rejecting them and hurting their intended purpose. The nature of the posts can't change over time? Be strategic for this point in the mission?
The nature of Q posts changed a lot, as if more than one personality. The comment above that there was too much data than needed. Q posted some very long posts with lots of info. in them. The trip code is correct
I agree. This post has only two declarative sentences. The rest are questions. I don't grasp the logic of "Oh, this can't be Q. He isn't telling us 'not enough'." How can he tell us anything new, if we insist that it not deviate from the past? I think somebody wants to take a ride in a time machine, "back to the Good Old Q Posts" when we were all watching a movie, and could argue about when/if the Storm would happen!