Normally, I would say not voting on something that you have not decided upon a choice is a vote with INTEGRITY.
But in the case of a change to a state's Constitution, I wonder if a NO vote is better, as defeats may encourage better efforts to give voters more info on the change. Still working on what are proper defaults for voting ambiguous stuff.
Normally, I would say not voting on something that you have not decided upon a choice is a vote with INTEGRITY.
But in the case of a change to a state's Constitution, I wonder if a NO vote is better, as defeats may encourage better efforts to give voters more info on the change. Still working on what are proper defaults for voting ambiguous stuff.
I agree. If its a law, it can always be repealed if it doesn't work out. Once its enshrined in (any) Constitution, good luck ever undoing that.