- Endless lies (media control)
- Endless wars (all wars are banker wars)
- Endless 'printing' (...hmm starting to sound like Rothschilds?)
Throw your ego away for a minute.
Our country, at least on paper, is a Republic. WE THE PEOPLE will put an END TO THE ENDLESS!!!1 Yeah...well technically, elected officials have the power to put an 'end to the endless' today. Begs the question. Why haven't they done so in the last 100 years?
Answer: Blackmail strings.
The + symbol used so often by Q, is a reference to Godfather logo's puppetmaster strings. Our reality is so Clown World, that our battling politicians are nothing but puppets owned by different puppetmasters, who don't always see eye to eye. Example. The 2008 Democrat Primary was between Renegade Hussein and Evergreen Hillary Blythe, aka Al-Waleed vs. Rothschild.
Nov 2017, Al-Waleed +++ is purged ("One side of the triangle removed (1st time in history)" -Q)
- In 2018 Q asserted the structure of the Federal Reserve would change.
- March of 2020 is when we saw this change.
It is not hyperbole to state that the purge of Al-Waleed +++ cut the blackmail strings of half US politicians. Obama himself, is said to have pathetically shopped around for another billionaire to hitch his strings to before ultimately Flipping. I'd assume a plea deal that would preserve his legacy in some fashion (GAW users will hate to stomach that one). But it was logical game theory. His Flipping demoralized fellow Clowns who admired him, promoting more Flips and 'Suicide Squad' offers.
So successful were Patriots at Flipping, Biden and later Kamala were Flipped a month before the 2020 Election. If you refuse to entertain that, digest some reading material and continue. This is why Biden makes a ludicrous amount of gaffes, while his actions have caused NOTHING that causes irreparable harm to the United States. Nor weakens her military.
By now you understand the importance of Comms. Giving the Comms Aware, be they Clown or Patriot, updates on current state of a given Op, is of the utmost importance. 'Deaths' are often used to symbolize this. They've been doing this for a looong time. Quick example of this usage:
- 12/12/1939 Former King of Hollywood Douglas Elton Fairbanks death
- +3 days
- 12/15/1939 Gone with the Wind premiered three day festival
"A transition embodied in the actor. A message sent that the silent age of films was over. That just having a pretty face was no longer enough. This film was promoted to punctuate the changing of an age. ...Wind = Speech. Fairbanks (and countless others) were GONE WITH THE WIND."
We, even as Media-skeptic anons, swallow news of celebrity deaths without question. That being said, understand that the physical well-being of Rothschild is honestly less significant than the symbolic implication of his death. The timing of the reveal of the 'death' of Evelyn de Rothschild(++), the morning of Election Day, is suspect. "A keen horse trainer and owner", horse races have symbolized political races for over 100 years now. Reconcile the meaning of being a trainer and owner.
The timing of this tremendous Comm ensures that it is related to the Election. You have what could very well be the other half of US politicians strings being cut. The blackmail evidence on these politicians, in the hands of Q team. The reality-changing Comm for these politicians were sent so close to the Election, that the Democrat rigging machine could not alter its course if it wanted to.
So what do we now have? We have dozens and dozens of Democrat politicians who no longer have string protection from Rothschild ++, and who Patriots have by the short hairs. Plus, proof of Election rigging as the Patriots newest Trump card. I cannot imagine a smoother transition to the Great Awakening than to have Republican and Democrats (now no longer protected) come together in unison.
Again. All this effort is not being done for you and me to have a comfy transition to Great Awakening. It is all being done for the masses. Q cares about us, but Q's not worried about us. We can handle it.
I can quote Q too.
u/#q894
Why would he try to claim Kenyan citizenship if he had "muh deal"?
Furthermore, the statement "When I'm done it'll be like you were never even here." completely negates your statements that Obama's legacy will be preserved.
Nice, yes that Q post threatening Obama is March 2018.
The Q post laughing at Hussein trying to hitch his strings is Dec 2017.
Q threatened Hussein a great deal in this time period.
u/#q1043
Correct me if I'm wrong, but these pictures never materialized by Q. Was Q lying to us? Or was it a threat that landed.
"Handlers Removed Nov 2017. Flip confimed July 2018
Cutting strings from one master does not necessarily free a person underneath. Sometimes this is because they simply choose not to flip, more often it’s because because there is more than one person holding more than one string. In fact it is due to “having it all” that put us in a world wide stalemate. It was in effect having strings.
World stalemate was before Waleed was captured. Afterwards is when Politician string power shifted to patriot’s direction. Some remained in a stalemate due to strings from both sides or were deemed not useful. I believe these make up many of those forced to resign. https://qresear.ch/resignations
But many were deemed useful and became an avalanche of flips as the patriot strings far outnumbered the clown ones."
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/03/04/flips-overview-obama-biden-kamala/
If I use quotes, I am quoting someone else. Most likely, the article I link at the end of my comment. DecodingSymbols certainly has confidence in his decodes, that's probably what irks you. I can understand that reaction.
Do you not think there was a back and forth between VIPs like Obama and Q happening via Comms in 2018? The part we see, the obvious threat of the AK-47 pictures, was written in plain old english for us anons to see. If Q wanted to send that message to Hussein via Comms, he would have. The anons seeing it was solely to up the tension.
Do I feel angry that we were 'used' in that way? To up the tension? Do I believe Q is less 'legit' if he doesn't surface those pics he promised? No, and No.
100% Agreed.
My sole point is whoever wrote the post doesn't know any more than anyone else, and in fact there are many Q posts that contradict it.
Whether or not I think its plausible is a completely different discussion that's irrelevant to the point. But if we had that discussion, I'd preface it with saying I'm only speculating and I have no real way of knowing, the same as anyone else who isn't a Q-insider.