Malaria is rare because the conditions for its propagation are rare. And it is detectable as such, without any confusion with other diseases. Bill Gates bringing millions of mosquitoes is a fantasy.
Bioweapons are designed to work on human beings, not on economies. Pretty funny that smart guys like Didier Raoult and Vladimir Zelenko didn't understand there was no virus and therefore developed their treatments on the basis of nothing whatsoever. (In other words, you are talking through your hat.)
I will agree it is a chemical weapon, but it is called mRNA and it causes the body to produce the protein spikes, which are insidious and pernicious. The metal bits are not good, but are an open question.
The masks are useless and futile and promote the cultivation of bacteria, which is enough to cause serious problems. Corpses of people who died from the 1918 flu epidemic have been found with evidence that the people died of pneumonia rather than the flu. The masks had been killing them. Anything can be toxic at a certain concentration (e.g., water and oxygen). (And I am not talking about drowning.)
I never said you said that HCQ and Ivermectin didn't work. The drugs were effective because they were zinc ionophores, and zinc present in the cells prevents virus replication. This is the Zelenko insight. It had nothing to do with cures when the problem was definitely NOT malaria (as in Zambia, where everyone knows the signs of malaria). It is commonplace for conspiracy zealots to declare that certain facts of existence are not real. It seems to be a necessary closure to the need for a paranoid assessment of the world: replace facts with fantasy. But Zelenko pointed out that if caught too late, HCQ etc. would not be as effective and other therapeutics would be needed. Hard to reconcile "it doesn't exist" with "the Zelenko cure works." How can you cure something that doesn't exist?
I'm not misrepresenting anything. I don't have the time or energy to bother doing that. I'm just throwing your own words---and their implications---back at you. You own the logic as well as the words. But since you don't know malaria from the flu, and you dismiss those who absolutely know malaria from the flu---and who never fall that ill from either---then I conclude you are a bit of a hothouse orchid, and I am the cold draft of air that you don't flourish in.
Malaria is rare because the conditions for its propagation are rare. And it is detectable as such, without any confusion with other diseases. Bill Gates bringing millions of mosquitoes is a fantasy.
Bioweapons are designed to work on human beings, not on economies. Pretty funny that smart guys like Didier Raoult and Vladimir Zelenko didn't understand there was no virus and therefore developed their treatments on the basis of nothing whatsoever. (In other words, you are talking through your hat.)
I will agree it is a chemical weapon, but it is called mRNA and it causes the body to produce the protein spikes, which are insidious and pernicious. The metal bits are not good, but are an open question.
The masks are useless and futile and promote the cultivation of bacteria, which is enough to cause serious problems. Corpses of people who died from the 1918 flu epidemic have been found with evidence that the people died of pneumonia rather than the flu. The masks had been killing them. Anything can be toxic at a certain concentration (e.g., water and oxygen). (And I am not talking about drowning.)
I never said you said that HCQ and Ivermectin didn't work. The drugs were effective because they were zinc ionophores, and zinc present in the cells prevents virus replication. This is the Zelenko insight. It had nothing to do with cures when the problem was definitely NOT malaria (as in Zambia, where everyone knows the signs of malaria). It is commonplace for conspiracy zealots to declare that certain facts of existence are not real. It seems to be a necessary closure to the need for a paranoid assessment of the world: replace facts with fantasy. But Zelenko pointed out that if caught too late, HCQ etc. would not be as effective and other therapeutics would be needed. Hard to reconcile "it doesn't exist" with "the Zelenko cure works." How can you cure something that doesn't exist?
I'm not misrepresenting anything. I don't have the time or energy to bother doing that. I'm just throwing your own words---and their implications---back at you. You own the logic as well as the words. But since you don't know malaria from the flu, and you dismiss those who absolutely know malaria from the flu---and who never fall that ill from either---then I conclude you are a bit of a hothouse orchid, and I am the cold draft of air that you don't flourish in.