However, the real question goes back to 1816 and maybe 1791.
In 1816, Justice Marshall delivered a landmark ruling on whether or not the fed government is entitled to setup banks.
Interestingly, this ties in with Trumps contention that he only wants judges who follow the Constitution as it is written and not try to legislate from the bench by finding lawyerly hair splitting solutions, like Justice Marshall. In essence his opinion was that the Constitution should have the phrase: expressly in order to be counted as not enumerated.
And this brings us to 1791, when the Constitution of the United States was put into being. The reason for saying good bye to the Articles of Confederation was the dispute over the debts of the Revolutionary war. These were not only internal debts, like debts towards states and individuals, but also towards foreigners. And it is especially this category of creditors that time and again play a significant role in the direction of the country.
Debts, especially foreign debts, in this case at least 3 million gold francs to the Rothschild bankers, had to be paid back. And without taxes, it would become very difficult for the government of the Federation to pay it, or at least, there would be a difficulty in establishing a trustworthy framework.
So, basically, this is the main driver for establishing the Constitution: to be able to impose and collect taxes.
The Civil War basically put all new States to the Federation under bankruptcy law, and have remained there till now.
Another factor in this story, is that world-wide, during the 19th century, silver was being demonetized. It is interesting to note the role the India -> China -> Great Brittain trade played with a special mention of opium. This particular item was used to bled China dry of Silver. Yet, at the same time we see demonetization of Silver in the UK, The Netherlands, The US, etcetera in favor of paper money.
The Fed, by booms and bust, created the need to demonetize gold, and require more collateral. Not only in the US, but everywhere.
So, yes, step 1 would indeed be to focus on the FED. Once the FED is gone, the rest will follow, including the implosion of the debt-cycle-system. However, it requires a reassessment of the distribution of the means of production, due to the nature of the Central Bank system: the coagulation of real property towards the less than 1%.
FED into focus is the right path.
However, the real question goes back to 1816 and maybe 1791.
In 1816, Justice Marshall delivered a landmark ruling on whether or not the fed government is entitled to setup banks. Interestingly, this ties in with Trumps contention that he only wants judges who follow the Constitution as it is written and not try to legislate from the bench by finding lawyerly hair splitting solutions, like Justice Marshall. In essence his opinion was that the Constitution should have the phrase: expressly in order to be counted as not enumerated.
And this brings us to 1791, when the Constitution of the United States was put into being. The reason for saying good bye to the Articles of Confederation was the dispute over the debts of the Revolutionary war. These were not only internal debts, like debts towards states and individuals, but also towards foreigners. And it is especially this category of creditors that time and again play a significant role in the direction of the country.
Debts, especially foreign debts, in this case at least 3 million gold francs to the Rothschild bankers, had to be paid back. And without taxes, it would become very difficult for the government of the Federation to pay it, or at least, there would be a difficulty in establishing a trustworthy framework.
So, basically, this is the main driver for establishing the Constitution: to be able to impose and collect taxes.
The Civil War basically put all new States to the Federation under bankruptcy law, and have remained there till now.
Another factor in this story, is that world-wide, during the 19th century, silver was being demonetized. It is interesting to note the role the India -> China -> Great Brittain trade played with a special mention of opium. This particular item was used to bled China dry of Silver. Yet, at the same time we see demonetization of Silver in the UK, The Netherlands, The US, etcetera in favor of paper money.
The Fed, by booms and bust, created the need to demonetize gold, and require more collateral. Not only in the US, but everywhere.
So, yes, step 1 would indeed be to focus on the FED. Once the FED is gone, the rest will follow, including the implosion of the debt-cycle-system. However, it requires a reassessment of the distribution of the means of production, due to the nature of the Central Bank system: the coagulation of real property towards the less than 1%.