Do you actually believe that China can feed a population of about a billion? The number is not 7 billion, it's more like 2.5 tops
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Oh, I don't doubt all this modeling is taught in high school and college math. That doesn't mean it has anything to do with reality.
So let me get this straight:
People in the 1960’s predict that the global population in circa 2010 will be 7 billion people. This prediction comes to pass. You assert that everyone is fudging their numbers because you think it’s impossible for such a prediction to be made. I explain the math behind such predictions, and your response is that the math doesn’t correspond to reality, despite the fact that the original prediction is, as far as we know, accurate.
So population modeling is inaccurate because population statistics are being fudged, and the statistics must be fudged because the modeling must be inaccurate. This is circular reasoning.
Again, I agree that some countries, particularly China, are probably fudging their population stats. However, if you’re going to assert that the global population numbers are off by, for example, 10% or more, then you’re obligated to provide more evidence for this than “it can’t be that many people because it matches predictions from 50+ years ago; there’s no way they could predict that”.
Let me help you by breaking down the circular reasoning.
Lets start with the elites with an agenda of depopulation in early 1900s. These elites are the same ones funding academic research (amongst many other things).
Step 1: Their agenda requires making people believe that there is a population explosion.
Step 2: Fund those research that helps with your agenda, push them to mainstream. In this case, the models that predict this particular growth
Step 3: Ensure population numbers as accepted are fudged enough to follow this model.
None of these steps are unbelievable, infact they pretty much exposed themselves last two years when they showed us how badly medical research field has been controlled by these same people.
They do it all the time. They tried to do it with "climate change", they do it with pandemics, they do it with pretty much everything.
Climate change didnt work because temperatures can be recorded by anyone, anywhere.
With pandemics it worked pretty well. They predicted pandemics, they funded the research, and then suddenly we had pandemics.
I could understand this kind of incredulity 3 years ago, even amongst the most awake people, but at this point we can decide to be this naive at our own peril.