Uh, guys... a Supreme Court case regarding the 2020 election just hit the docket. A fellow pede posted it in a random thread. - The Great Awakening

555

Uh, guys... a Supreme Court case regarding the 2020 election just hit the docket. A fellow pede posted it in a random thread. (www.supremecourt.gov) 💊 RAW UNCUT HOPIUM 💊

posted 2 years ago by TacticalWitdotcom 2 years ago by TacticalWitdotcom +557 / -2

144 comments

144 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (144)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– CQVFEFE 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Trump saying he is running for 2024 is an admission that he is not currently President.

He is not. Sort of.

And he is. Sort of.

The idea that he is currently president is both desire-driven fantasy, since someone impersonating Senator Joe Biden is being regarded all over the country and world as the US president right now; and technically true: Trump DID WIN the most electoral votes in 2020 (410, per OAN); and the other side was conclusively proven beyond any sliver of doubt to have systematically cheated, which disqualifies them outright (Fraud vitiates everything), and the victory automatically goes to the candidate with the most votes who didn't cheat (Trump). The certification of Jan 6/7 was also fraudulent, since Pence and the RINOs did it KNOWINGLY. If words mean anything, Trump won the presidential election, in a glorious multimillion-vote margin of a landslide, so he should be/is/but not really/but he factually did win, legally/but anyhow he's gotta run in 2024 to become the president again.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q