My take on the "2024" speech - The Great Awakening

My take on the "2024" speech WWG1WGA

posted 1 year ago by Deaf_MAGA_Pede 1 year ago by Deaf_MAGA_Pede +258 / -5

I've been thinking this one out for a while so if this has been mentioned already elsewhere then well, "Great Minds Think Alike" I'd say!

Anyways, I think the main reason why President Trump announced his 2024 run is due to the Jan6 Unselect Committee being somewhat disbanded. I believe if they were still together and they were able to brand Trump as a guilty insurrectionist, this meant President Trump can't run for a 2nd term ever again as long as he lives? (Correct me if I'm wrong on this one)

Now with the J6 Unselect being somewhat disbanded, he's rubbing this into their faces, basically saying, "Whatchu gonna do now?! You can't brand me an insurrectionist now so now I can make my announcement!"

This should be an attempt to get the Demtards in a rage, causing them to make a lot of missteps along the way. Hopefully the FTX situation is exposed big time to the point where it will now requires an international investigation and then "Saving Israel for last" will follow?

I'm just throwing things out there to see what sticks because I'm trying my best to not be blackpilled. Yes the feeling is somewhat the same as that day when we all found out President Trump "lost" in 2020 and all of the stupid doomers on Patriots.Win throwing out blackpills left and right, and I'm like Neo in The Matrix, dodging all of them on the way to GAW.

But until then, I'm thinking positive and this whole "2024" speech last night felt off to me, like there's a hidden meaning behind the speech. Even Trump's composure felt different to me, almost like he's trying to show us he's being "calm" before the storm?

126 comments

126 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (126)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– schiff_for_brains 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It’s a state issue. We need to work on that level.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– SkoaPenhagen 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Easy to say for red states. What about Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona etc? You'd have to beat the fraud and if a candidate like Kari Lake couldn't do it then what? It's no coincidence that her opponent just happens to be in charge of the elections in Arizona either. True the vote, Mike Lindell, and everyone else can monitor elections and expose as much fraud as they want but they don't have the power to change the law. You'd have to convince those states that the fraud was real and these days you could slap dems in the face with all the evidence in the world and it wouldn't matter. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't force it to drink.