The problem is that much of this evidence came out two years ago, was presented to the courts, and the lawyers and courts sneered at all of it and basically said, "So what? Frankly we don't give a damn."
Their sneering was hidden behind several legal subterfuges, a popular one was the judicial judgement call that a plaintiff did not have standing. Another was that the filing was not timely.
Who went to jail for ten or twenty years?
Who was tried for sedition?
See anything on Fox about trials for treason?
No?
So what must change to overhaul our electoral system? and what force will be REQUIRED to drive this great upheaval?
I do believe that Q-Trump has given us the answer to these questions on several occasions: Military is the ony way.
And last - what is the required trigger event?
More evidence?
Sure. More evidence will help, will be a factor, but I don't think more evidence is going to trigger the upheaval.
The problem is that much of this evidence came out two years ago, was presented to the courts, and the lawyers and courts sneered at all of it and basically said, "So what? Frankly we don't give a damn."
Their sneering was hidden behind several legal subterfuges, a popular one was the judicial judgement call that a plaintiff did not have standing. Another was that the filing was not timely.
Who went to jail for ten or twenty years?
Who was tried for sedition?
See anything on Fox about trials for treason?
No?
So what must change to overhaul our electoral system? and what force will be REQUIRED to drive this great upheaval?
I do believe that Q-Trump has given us the answer to these questions on several occasions: Military is the ony way.
And last - what is the required trigger event?
More evidence?
Sure. More evidence will help, will be a factor, but I don't think more evidence is going to trigger the upheaval.
I wish I knew the answer.