Elon just posted this. Hilarious!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (151)
sorted by:
Incorrect, and I already explained the reasons why. But you are bound to dig your heels further into the ground because you have nothing else. What is a “modern interpretation?”
Modern suggests being new and novel, such neo-orthodox or something else that undermines what is true, therefore contradicting that truth which has stood the test of time since the apostles, the reformers, and our current day (leaning on and standing in line with what is historically biblical, accepted by the true church and orthodox).
I don’t think you understand your own argument. The reason is, it is self-defeating.
Again, like I stated before, your premise for argumentation is openness and inclusivism, which is the same foundation that postmodernism and “leftism” hinge on. So, in that respect, you are more in line with “being like a leftist” than the person you accused earlier in the post/thread.
Is God all loving or not?
If he is, why would people born in India or China go to Hell because they started with the "wrong" religion?
We are incapable of determining what God is required to do or not do. The reason is, we are His creation and He is our Creator. He is also the author of morality. Therefore, we do not create systems of rules for which we obligate God to fit into or not and then determine or conclude He is loving or not. Scripture speaks to all people who are born in environments of various religions and exposure to (or lack thereof) the gospel:
13 For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
14 How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? 15 And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!” 16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?” 17 So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ. Romans 10:13-17.
Additionally, all people recognize their Creator (whether we like it or not, or agree with it or not) by observing all of creation. And the moral law of God is in all people, which is sufficient enough to compel people to search for Him. Those who genuinely do, He grants the finding and He grants the truly repentant heart salvation. Regarding moral law in all people:
12 For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. 13 For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified. 14 For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15 They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them 16 on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus. Romans 2:12-16
Arguments of geographical location collapse on themselves and in the face of the Word of God. Loopholes to argue against God do not exist.
"We are incapable of determining what God is required to do or not do. The reason is, we are His creation and He is our Creator. He is also the author of morality. Therefore, we do not create systems of rules for which we obligate God to fit into or not and then determine or conclude He is loving or not. Scripture speaks to all people who are born in environments of various religions and exposure to (or lack thereof) the gospel:"
Yet Christianity is the only way to subscribe to God?
So YOU anthropomorphize God, say that the only way to God is Christianity, discredit all other ways of reaching God, and then say we can't figure out what God wants to do?
You're free to worship God in anyway you choose. I don't have a problem with Christianity, but your argument is poor.
You have to say that because you have nothing else to say. Just pretend that I copied and pasted my previous comment, and then re-read it… but this time, make a real effort to understand it
Furthermore, anthropomorphism is not equal to letting God be who He is. You are creating a strawman argument (in ignorance) for the sake of making further opposition to me, but the problem is you do not understand what that word means. If you did, you would recognize my comment is the opposite of that. In a way, you are projecting that argument toward me, and I’ll explain how:
You create your own system of man-made rules and moral authority, and then you force God to fit into it against and in the face of God being the supreme moral law giver as revealed in the Word of God. So, in that sense you are making God more like a human (human characterization of God), when in reality He transcends what you perceive Him and obligate Him to be.
You are not equipped for this. This has become tiresome because you choose obstinance over willingness to learn and understand. I will no longer comment with you because it has no profit or value beyond this.
You will never create a victorious argument against God and His Word.
Christianity isn't the only way to God. The Holy Bible and Daoism reach the same destination in different paths - that we should love each other and care for fellow man. I just prefer to interpret God as not comprehensible by men in entirety and not anthropomorphize him to be an entity with wrathful intentions of converting everyone to Christianity while dooming every other kind spirit to hell.