I’ve discussed Juan a few times and it always ruffles Anon’s feathers about him being a “grifter”, or him being full of crap, or just a typical “Truther” with no real connections. But did you Anons realize that in the current world of our Digital War, we have digital Truther fakery going on? Yes we do! And it’s to CONFUSE PEOPLE that don’t listen, just impulsively respond to a title of a post, and certainly don’t do their own Research!
So to each and every one of you I present 100% proof there are two Juan O’Savins. They both don’t show their faces but mostly boots or an outside scene. Both talk about very similar events around the same time, but have extravagant differences IF, IF You The Listener take the time to LISTEN, and Carefully Process What is said and What is not said, but Implied. Below I have the two links to show you, and will summarize what to listen for to tell the difference between the FAKE Juan, and the REAL Juan.
The Real Juan: The Real Kid By The Side Of The Road Juan O’Savin, pronounced One-Oh-Seven, or 1-Oh-7, also referred to as 17. David Nino Rodriguez only meets with this Juan, and calls him One-ee-toe, not Wan-ee-toe. Must listen carefully. How do I know he is the real deal. One, the way he sounds: Low gravely voice with a gravely laugh. What he talks about: The real Juan states and connects current events, info, Intel, and especially high level Biblical references in an extremely intelligent Game and String Theory, Robin Williams or Jordan Peterson-like way. His information is so on point or incredible sounding, it nearly sounds like what Normies refer to as Conspiracy BS.
If you’ve read William Cooper’s “Behold A Pale Horse”, you just might swear you hear this version of Juan talking the same manner. His book Kid By The Side Of The Road exactly matches not only his Game/String Theory speech and ideas, but is highly detailed in history and events most people don’t connect easily, and has a whole chapter on what Q is. Last, we have actually seen this Juan in person now. So he’s not a hidden face anymore.
https://rumble.com/vo9b9z-i-see-you-juan-o-savin.html
Okay, now to the fake Juan: Easy to tell them apart if you now listen to the link provided below. No gravely voice or laugh, more high pitched, and he talks very easily and clearly about subjects. Though he also talks in a Game Theory manner, it is very simplified, and his Biblical referencing is NO-WHERE-NEAR The Level of intelligence or deep connection that our first Juan presents. This Juan also tends to datefag every few shows, where as the 1st Juan only made that mistake once, being right after the 2020 election. Our 1st Juan hasn’t done so since.
They both appear to put on a similar number of shows but only with certain “Truthers” each. The fake Juan also does his own alone shows on Rumble and YouTube, while the real Juan does not do alone shows, except for shorts, on his own podcast site. Last, this Juan does not have a book, and we’ve NEVER seen his face, nor has this one ever talked about him showing up live in Las Vegas. FOR THE IMPULSIVE ADHD BRAINS FLAMING ME ABOUT THE F-ing BEGINNING of the below video link, FAST-THE-F-FORWARD IN THE BELOW VIDEO to the 2ish minute mark, TO F-ing hear the DIFFERENT PERSON from the intro guy, and PAY ATTENTION!!
https://rumble.com/v1tza4q-juan-o-savin-shocking-big-news-update-nov-12.2022-trump-news.html
Okay Anons, there you have this piece of the puzzle, connecting to my last entry I did on the real Juan here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6zdrzN7/kid-by-the-side-of-the-road-theo/
I will be dropping the final entry with thee cookie crumbs once we are at the right point, so stay tuned. Thank you all, God bless your hard work for Where We Go One We Go All, together.
https://rumble.com/v1tza4q-juan-o-savin-shocking-big-news-update-nov-12.2022-trump-news.html
So for the link above I would argue that that is not "another Juan" at all, the guy speaking in the video does not claim to be Juan and starts off by saying "Welcome to Patriot Underground" which is another channel and they do not claim to be Juan, as far as I know. This "Trump News Channel" is just one of the many on Rumble that repost videos and put misleading titles on them. Definitely muddies the water in the info war but not hard to see that that is what is going on. When it comes to the two Juans theories I thought that there was an original 107 from like 2017 to 2019 or 2020 and that is the one people point to as Vincent Fusca or whatever his name is, I believe he was even at a Trump state of the union, and then the current Juan, the supposed Wayne Willot one, is the current one who has even alluded to the other Juan in videos.
Regardless, when I found out about 107 earlier this year I tried to dig on him and the only things I could find were MSM hit pieces claiming he is Wayne Willot and he made his fame investigating Clinton scandals in Arkansas such as the rumored Mena trafficking operations (drugs and kids). This alone made me go "huh" and tipped the scale towards WH for me while realizing it could be a BH piece to corroborate such an extrapolation. The lack of supporting information otherwise further deepens the mystery. In interviews Juan has brought this up in roundabout ways that confirm his work in Arkansas investigating the Clintons. All I know is I am one of the apparent few who is interested enough in what he talks about to give a listen and discern for myself. Everyone is so quick to make out that he says xyz is going to happen but in my experience that could not be further from the truth.
To me it seems like he lays out the battlefield and theorizes on what could come next based on his experience and supposed connections and nothing further. He did datefag about Trump being reinstalled but that is plausible to me that it was disinfo to throw off / worry the BHs. Nowadays it seems he offers as much concrete info as the immediate detractors offer here but, in my opinion, he is still worth a listen while not being held up on a pedestal, just like all the contrarians here have some salient points to consider but not take as fact without seeking for yourself.
I address this rumor in my prior discussion, linked at the bottom of the main post, on Wayne Willot. But Anon, you could be correct. Many pieces of information and disinformation are all over our thickly blanketed 5D chess board.
I read that one too, I just was corroborating the Wayne Willot info/rumor with my own experience. Do you think all these immediate detractors on your Juan posts are shills or just pompous people who saw one thing and therefore know it all? Are 107 stickies effectively a bait to find the bots/shills?
I say this because there always seems to be a coordinated detracting campaign on 107 posts here on GAW with most being short trite "he's a grifter, move along" or these full of themselves "I know everything blah blah" essays that just keep reiterating that they are right because they are while twisting everything to fit their confirmation bias while offering nothing as to how they could be wrong because of the verifiable fog of war.