Other historians claim the reason there is zero documentation by the germans of the holocaust is because they destroyed everything when they began losing the war. I recently watched a jewish documentary where they made this claim.
Yes, you need a lecture because you are ignorant. Like that nonsense about "Hogan's Heroes." Or that nobody was aware of the Holocaust before 1970. You don't lead with howlers and expect to be taken seriously.
The only "dots" you are "connecting" are imaginary. Which is why people like you are called "dotty."
That explains the discovery of the receipts for purchase of the large quantities of Zyklon B, right? How about the library of skills set aside by the SS? It was a mixed bag. It would have been rational clean-up to eliminate evidence, but not everything was eliminated.
It produces hydrogen cyanide upon reaction with water, which is equally lethal against human beings. It was used to kill 1.1 million Jews in the death camps. One of its creators, Bruno Tesch, was executed in 1946 for knowingly selling the compound to the SS for use on humans.
And do you have any reason to think the Jewish scholars are wrong?
I think it would be weird that every documentary I have seen that debunks holocaust revisionists claim that no evidence exists because the germans destroyed them, even digging up the bodies and turning them to dust, if there actually existed evidence.
I think it’s up to you to link to these documents if they exist. I really can’t help you here.
Other historians claim the reason there is zero documentation by the germans of the holocaust is because they destroyed everything when they began losing the war. I recently watched a jewish documentary where they made this claim.
The reply above yours by the boomer is exactly what I would expect.
Comes here to lecture us on “established history” while failing to connect the dots of history being written by the victors.
Yes, you need a lecture because you are ignorant. Like that nonsense about "Hogan's Heroes." Or that nobody was aware of the Holocaust before 1970. You don't lead with howlers and expect to be taken seriously.
The only "dots" you are "connecting" are imaginary. Which is why people like you are called "dotty."
Please regurgitate more “facts” pumped through your 1950’s cathode ray tube TV absorbed by you while 10 years old.
I see you have nothing of substance to reply. I don't believe we had a TV in the 1950s. Tough luck for you.
That explains the discovery of the receipts for purchase of the large quantities of Zyklon B, right? How about the library of skills set aside by the SS? It was a mixed bag. It would have been rational clean-up to eliminate evidence, but not everything was eliminated.
Zyklon B was bought for delousing. But it’s not me saying all evidence was destroyed, it’s jewish scholars.
Here’s one: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000fjqk
It produces hydrogen cyanide upon reaction with water, which is equally lethal against human beings. It was used to kill 1.1 million Jews in the death camps. One of its creators, Bruno Tesch, was executed in 1946 for knowingly selling the compound to the SS for use on humans.
And do you have any reason to think the Jewish scholars are wrong?
I think it would be weird that every documentary I have seen that debunks holocaust revisionists claim that no evidence exists because the germans destroyed them, even digging up the bodies and turning them to dust, if there actually existed evidence.
I think it’s up to you to link to these documents if they exist. I really can’t help you here.