Of course the Nuremberg Trials (and death camp trials) happened after the War. That is where all the evidence was presented. You are projecting. (The idea that "jewish organizations" would shower me with money is an emotional image.) There would be a lesson if you could articulate it---which you do not. Just more empty verbiage. It has nothing to do with being "ready." It has to do with being present.
I really have no patience with fantasy assertions by those who assume a lofty position while trivializing the deaths of millions of Jews in the name of truth.
So why do you think a jewish documentary debunking holocaust denial would make such a ridiculous claim if they according to you could just produce all the evidence prsented in the Nuremburg trials? Seems foolish.
I don't have to explain anything. Who says they were ever interested in the evidence? See, here's the thing: you have no ability to make the argument yourself. You have to point to videos or other transient sources. There is no earthshaking book exposing all this, is there?
The only credible way to "debunk" the existing history is to arrive at an independent and fully-referenced estimate of the correct number. That's how things are disproven---by offering an alternate and justified answer. All this arm-waving to merely deny the history is piffle. It's not a serious debunk at all. It is just contrarian propaganda.
The Nuremberg Trials already did. Your suggestion is ridiculous.
They happened after the war. I think you are too emotional about this to think clearly. There is a lesson here for you, when you are ready for it.
Of course the Nuremberg Trials (and death camp trials) happened after the War. That is where all the evidence was presented. You are projecting. (The idea that "jewish organizations" would shower me with money is an emotional image.) There would be a lesson if you could articulate it---which you do not. Just more empty verbiage. It has nothing to do with being "ready." It has to do with being present.
I really have no patience with fantasy assertions by those who assume a lofty position while trivializing the deaths of millions of Jews in the name of truth.
So why do you think a jewish documentary debunking holocaust denial would make such a ridiculous claim if they according to you could just produce all the evidence prsented in the Nuremburg trials? Seems foolish.
I don't have to explain anything. Who says they were ever interested in the evidence? See, here's the thing: you have no ability to make the argument yourself. You have to point to videos or other transient sources. There is no earthshaking book exposing all this, is there?
The only credible way to "debunk" the existing history is to arrive at an independent and fully-referenced estimate of the correct number. That's how things are disproven---by offering an alternate and justified answer. All this arm-waving to merely deny the history is piffle. It's not a serious debunk at all. It is just contrarian propaganda.