Gab’s Andrew Torba re:Elon “I was correct about Parler and their use of AI to censor, I was correct about Rumble and their “hate speech” terms of service, and I was correct about Gettr using AI to censor as well. All of them claim to support free speech and all of them bent the knee to the Regime…” - The Great Awakening

300

Gab’s Andrew Torba re:Elon “I was correct about Parler and their use of AI to censor, I was correct about Rumble and their “hate speech” terms of service, and I was correct about Gettr using AI to censor as well. All of them claim to support free speech and all of them bent the knee to the Regime…”

posted 1 year ago by truthloveliberty 1 year ago by truthloveliberty +300 / -0

I was correct about Parler and their use of AI to censor, I was correct about Rumble and their “hate speech” terms of service, and I was correct about Gettr using AI to censor as well. All of them claim to support free speech and all of them bent the knee to the Regime powers and censor “hate speech.” Twitter under Elon Musk is no different and my analysis about this situation will be right as well. Believe me now or thank me later. Take it or leave it. ….

Nothing has changed at Twitter and based on Elon Musk’s tweets over the past month nothing will be changing anytime soon. People who have been banned in the past have been given amnesty only to return to shout into the void. Folks like Alex Jones aren’t welcome back at all not because of specific policy violations, but rather because of Elon’s emotional reaction to him on a whim. The Twitter rules have not changed. The shadowbanning has not ended—in fact Musk is openly tweeting that “negative” and “hateful” content will be “deboosted” and celebrating that “hate speech” is being removed from view in record numbers. These are the facts.

Article: https://news.gab.com/2022/11/there-is-no-freedom-of-speech-without-freedom-of-reach/

92 comments

92 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (92)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– FractalizingIron 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Limiting any speech is unconstitutional.

er, seriously? You seem to have no comprehension of what the constitution is. The constitution is an instrument by which GOVERNMENT is curtailed and restricted in order to enforce the principled and godly paradigm of the People being the sovereign, and govt being the servant.

The constitution is NOT an instrument for enforcing individual rights vs individual rights.

The USE a BLOCK Button argument is stuffed with problems. "Regulate yourself" also implies "regulate what you create and operate".

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -2 ▼

– 1baldeagle -2 points 1 year ago +1 / -3

The Constitution is the law of the land. The only adjective before speech is Free. No one is responsible for your feelings. Use your block button is easy. You talk out of both sides of your mouth. Communists always desire to regulate speech. History demonstrates this BTW it doesn't take much to read the Constitution

▲ 1 ▼

– FractalizingIron 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

But apparently it takes something to understand it, which you quite apparently do not.