I think it serves them to keep stuff hidden because they have a narrative to uphold, and lies beget lies. Have you looked into the archeological sites that are locked to the public in NZ? e.g. http://www.celticnz.co.nz There a paleolithic/astrological observance sites, and even a pyramid, built along Egyptian lines and orientation, that go against the 'there were no people in NZ until the Maori got there' narrative ... There are 'Pakeha' (others?) in the northern Taranaki and King country that claim they have been there forever. Even the Maori speak of a red-haired people that were already living in NZ.
But NVM, there is a claim of we-wuz-indigenous peoples, that they want to implement via the UN. It is one powerful group of elites that have discovered how to influence politicians to get more power. Note that most Maoris don't even agree to all this. Quite disgusting, given all the different people: tiny shy fairy-like people living in caves near Rotorua, 'giant skeletons' found North of Raglan, etc. etc. that are quietly covered up and ignored. The official story is that there are no paleolithic remains, even as the carvings have celtic roots.
I find the level of denial around the Kaimanawa Wall to be most bemusing. I do not see how signs of ancient ruins from great antiquity causes any kind of challenge to Maori views about being the tangata whenua - no reasonable person disputes that when Capt Cook sailed into view Maori were all over the place, so why does an obvious man-made wall from great antiquity constitute such a threat. I do not believe the rest of the world understands how incredibly shut-down and closed-minded NZ has become over the past 20 years. We are a real-world example of Plato's cave.
Well thank you for the kind words.
I think it serves them to keep stuff hidden because they have a narrative to uphold, and lies beget lies. Have you looked into the archeological sites that are locked to the public in NZ? e.g. http://www.celticnz.co.nz There a paleolithic/astrological observance sites, and even a pyramid, built along Egyptian lines and orientation, that go against the 'there were no people in NZ until the Maori got there' narrative ... There are 'Pakeha' (others?) in the northern Taranaki and King country that claim they have been there forever. Even the Maori speak of a red-haired people that were already living in NZ.
But NVM, there is a claim of we-wuz-indigenous peoples, that they want to implement via the UN. It is one powerful group of elites that have discovered how to influence politicians to get more power. Note that most Maoris don't even agree to all this. Quite disgusting, given all the different people: tiny shy fairy-like people living in caves near Rotorua, 'giant skeletons' found North of Raglan, etc. etc. that are quietly covered up and ignored. The official story is that there are no paleolithic remains, even as the carvings have celtic roots.
How dare you!!
I find the level of denial around the Kaimanawa Wall to be most bemusing. I do not see how signs of ancient ruins from great antiquity causes any kind of challenge to Maori views about being the tangata whenua - no reasonable person disputes that when Capt Cook sailed into view Maori were all over the place, so why does an obvious man-made wall from great antiquity constitute such a threat. I do not believe the rest of the world understands how incredibly shut-down and closed-minded NZ has become over the past 20 years. We are a real-world example of Plato's cave.
Agreed.