David Nino Rodriguez with Ghost, Juan O Savin and one of the Brunson brothers whose case is now with the Supreme Court. Talk about the possibility of all the member who did not protect the people by taking the 10 days senator Cruz asked for on jan 6 to consider certification of the vote due to possible foreign interference.
The nature of the Brunson legal action is that representatives certified election results without conducting an investigation into the evidence of election fraud which was presented by US intelligence agencies (President Trump's E.O).
The 388 members of the government failed to do so prior to their certification of the fraudulent vote on Jan. 6th - which means they committed some very serious crimes in the process and at the very minimum can no longer hold any elected office in the US.
The SC could have taken many actions to kill this case, but instead have taken steps to facilitate its progress through the proceedings... and it is now going to be up for review. It has already gone much too far through the process to be easily ignored or legally brushed aside at this point. Everything indicates that it is likely to be heard by the SC.
The SC has some good incentives to move on this rapidly (during December) prior to the next session of congress in January... and here we are...
David Nino Rodriguez with Ghost, Juan O Savin and one of the Brunson brothers whose case is now with the Supreme Court. Talk about the possibility of all the member who did not protect the people by taking the 10 days senator Cruz asked for on jan 6 to consider certification of the vote due to possible foreign interference.
The nature of the Brunson legal action is that representatives certified election results without conducting an investigation into the evidence of election fraud which was presented by US intelligence agencies (President Trump's E.O).
The 388 members of the government failed to do so prior to their certification of the fraudulent vote on Jan. 6th - which means they committed some very serious crimes in the process and at the very minimum can no longer hold any elected office in the US.
The SC could have taken many actions to kill this case, but instead have taken steps to facilitate its progress through the proceedings... and it is now going to be up for review. It has already gone much too far through the process to be easily ignored or legally brushed aside at this point. Everything indicates that it is likely to be heard by the SC.
The SC has some good incentives to move on this rapidly (during December) prior to the next session of congress in January... and here we are...
This is kind of a big deal, no?
Can you point me to the 10 day requirement? I've searched the Constitution and can't find it directly.
That is my bad - I was looking at a combination of the 12th amendment, the Electoral Count rule of 1887, and more recent E.O's by President Trump.
You are correct, the 10 days for the review period was from Cruz. My bad on that.