The corporate "Federal" "The United States of America" and its corporate "Supreme Court" operate under military "Special Admiralty" jurisdiction of the sea. Very different from the "American" "the United States of America" operating within the "Law of the Land" (Common Law).
In the former, only LEGAL (dead/fictional) entities have "Standing" - Citizens, presidents, residents, persons, senators, etc. In the latter, only LAWFUL entities have "Standing" - e.g. men or women.
Thus, a "Man" cannot sue a "President" anymore then a "President" can sue a "Man". You're mixing the living (LAWFUL) and the dead (LEGAL) here.
If Brunson is none the wiser, which is likely the case, nobody is going to educate him in any position of power. And as such, they can LEGALLY declare the "Man" (Brunson) has no "Standing" in their special admiralty jurisdiction law-fare.
Maxim of Law: Ignorance of the law is no defense.
Rule of fair play: It's nobody's job to educate the ignorant (99% of the population).
If Brunson is using an attorney, he's already submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM where there are a thousand ways to dismiss the case, as it is designed to be this way. If he filed "Pro Se" he has also submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM as well.
Only filing a case "Sui Juris", as a man, against other men and women could produce the results he's ultimately looking for. Further, the supreme court justices would also have to change their hats and act as "Referees" rather than "Judges". Not sure how this would or could work without a jury of one's peers in the mix.
The corporate "Federal" "The United States of America" and its corporate "Supreme Court" operate under military "Special Admiralty" jurisdiction of the sea. Very different from the "American" "the United States of America" operating within the "Law of the Land" (Common Law).
In the former, only LEGAL (dead/fictional) entities have "Standing" - Citizens, presidents, residents, persons, senators, etc. In the latter, only LAWFUL entities have "Standing" - e.g. men or women.
Thus, a "Man" cannot sue a "President" anymore then a "President" can sue a "Man". You're mixing the living (LAWFUL) and the dead (LEGAL) here.
If Brunson is none the wiser, which is likely the case, nobody is going to educate him in any position of power. And as such, they can LEGALLY declare the "Man" (Brunson) has no "Standing" in their special admiralty jurisdiction law-fare.
Maxim of Law: Ignorance of the law is no defense.
Rule of fair play: It's nobody's job to educate the ignorant (99% of the population).
If Brunson is using an attorney, he's already submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM where there are a thousand ways to dismiss the case, as it is designed to be this way. If he filed "Pro Se" he has also submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM as well.
Only filing a case "Sui Juris", as a man, against other men and women could produce the results he's ultimately looking for. Further, the supreme court justices would also have to change their hats and act as "Referees" rather than "Judges". Not sure how this would or could work without a jury of one's peers in the mix.