The corporate "Federal" "The United States of America" and its corporate "Supreme Court" operate under military "Special Admiralty" jurisdiction of the sea. Very different from the "American" "the United States of America" operating within the "Law of the Land" (Common Law).
In the former, only LEGAL (dead/fictional) entities have "Standing" - Citizens, presidents, residents, persons, senators, etc. In the latter, only LAWFUL entities have "Standing" - e.g. men or women.
Thus, a "Man" cannot sue a "President" anymore then a "President" can sue a "Man". You're mixing the living (LAWFUL) and the dead (LEGAL) here.
If Brunson is none the wiser, which is likely the case, nobody is going to educate him in any position of power. And as such, they can LEGALLY declare the "Man" (Brunson) has no "Standing" in their special admiralty jurisdiction law-fare.
Maxim of Law: Ignorance of the law is no defense.
Rule of fair play: It's nobody's job to educate the ignorant (99% of the population).
If Brunson is using an attorney, he's already submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM where there are a thousand ways to dismiss the case, as it is designed to be this way. If he filed "Pro Se" he has also submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM as well.
Only filing a case "Sui Juris", as a man, against other men and women could produce the results he's ultimately looking for. Further, the supreme court justices would also have to change their hats and act as "Referees" rather than "Judges". Not sure how this would or could work without a jury of one's peers in the mix.
The Supreme Court already chose to bring it to conference where it needs 4 votes to proceed. They could have just ignored it, but the Court's Clerk wanted their filings as soon as possible.
All WoC are brought to conference. 100%. Thats where 98.7% of them go to die. The court gets about 7000 filings a year. They all go to conference. The Justices clerks review them first, write a short summary for their bosses, then they (the actual Justices) then decide. They burn through 100s a day during ‘conference’. In the end, They actually hear up to about150. This bullshit is dead on arrival
I realize that and I don’t disagree but the Court’s Clerk was going to accept their Rule 11 petition based on a national emergency bypassing the 10th Circuit Court before they ruled right before they filed. They then accepted their petition without the Rule 11 stuff. I would think if it was DOA they would never have accepted the Rule 11 petition (or we’re going to).
So why push Brunson to get it early though? Let's assume you are correct. The petition was properly filed, so they knew they had to process it and send it to the dumpster. Then why ask to get it early if that was their motivation? They could throw it out next week or next month just as easily as today.
There was a reason they wanted this case now. That implies it may not be headed straight for the dumpster. It could be as they say in the video, simply a defensive weapon against the Biden administration if they try and follow through on packing the court. Or it could be something more. But the events leading up to this indicate it is more than just an annoyance to them that they are planning on quashing.
We'll see I suppose. But the data on this one points to something with significance.
All I will say is, I truly hope you are correct and I hope I have to come in here and post how wrong I was. That is a fact. It would be incredible if somehow this passed in conference and was promoted to the docket. That being said … Im 99% certain this has all been weapons grade Hopium. A lot of people posted a lot of videos about this on the internet and didn't really think it through, or were intentionally preying on those of us praying for some kind of miracle to save our Republic.
I could be wrong, but my two cents....After the '20 election when there was a lot of hope that the SC would fix the fraud I thought they probably wouldn't, because it was too early.
To this day my thinking is that the election fraud was allowed to succeed (and that means SC didn't interfere) so DJT could be out of the picture while the Dems ran wild destroying the country right out in the open with everyone watching. If the SC or military would have interfered after the election the country would have been torn, and civil war could actually have been a real possibility. I believe intervention by the SC or military will not happen until we've hit the precipice and people are united and ready to demand change.
This is the correct response. Nothing will come of this case, the USSC is not about to toss every elected official. Just the fact that people believe this will happen is shocking and disheartening. This is why we aren't winning anything.
Let me predict the Supreme Court response: NO Standing. Seems to be their response to any case they don't want to hear.
If the president has no standing, and voters have no standing, who on earth has standing?
The corporate "Federal" "The United States of America" and its corporate "Supreme Court" operate under military "Special Admiralty" jurisdiction of the sea. Very different from the "American" "the United States of America" operating within the "Law of the Land" (Common Law).
In the former, only LEGAL (dead/fictional) entities have "Standing" - Citizens, presidents, residents, persons, senators, etc. In the latter, only LAWFUL entities have "Standing" - e.g. men or women.
Thus, a "Man" cannot sue a "President" anymore then a "President" can sue a "Man". You're mixing the living (LAWFUL) and the dead (LEGAL) here.
If Brunson is none the wiser, which is likely the case, nobody is going to educate him in any position of power. And as such, they can LEGALLY declare the "Man" (Brunson) has no "Standing" in their special admiralty jurisdiction law-fare.
Maxim of Law: Ignorance of the law is no defense.
Rule of fair play: It's nobody's job to educate the ignorant (99% of the population).
If Brunson is using an attorney, he's already submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM where there are a thousand ways to dismiss the case, as it is designed to be this way. If he filed "Pro Se" he has also submitted to the LEGAL SYSTEM as well.
Only filing a case "Sui Juris", as a man, against other men and women could produce the results he's ultimately looking for. Further, the supreme court justices would also have to change their hats and act as "Referees" rather than "Judges". Not sure how this would or could work without a jury of one's peers in the mix.
The Supreme Court already chose to bring it to conference where it needs 4 votes to proceed. They could have just ignored it, but the Court's Clerk wanted their filings as soon as possible.
All WoC are brought to conference. 100%. Thats where 98.7% of them go to die. The court gets about 7000 filings a year. They all go to conference. The Justices clerks review them first, write a short summary for their bosses, then they (the actual Justices) then decide. They burn through 100s a day during ‘conference’. In the end, They actually hear up to about150. This bullshit is dead on arrival
I realize that and I don’t disagree but the Court’s Clerk was going to accept their Rule 11 petition based on a national emergency bypassing the 10th Circuit Court before they ruled right before they filed. They then accepted their petition without the Rule 11 stuff. I would think if it was DOA they would never have accepted the Rule 11 petition (or we’re going to).
Correct. What I meant by DOA is when the justices clerks do their collective thing. They will in all likelihood send it to the trash heap.
So why push Brunson to get it early though? Let's assume you are correct. The petition was properly filed, so they knew they had to process it and send it to the dumpster. Then why ask to get it early if that was their motivation? They could throw it out next week or next month just as easily as today.
There was a reason they wanted this case now. That implies it may not be headed straight for the dumpster. It could be as they say in the video, simply a defensive weapon against the Biden administration if they try and follow through on packing the court. Or it could be something more. But the events leading up to this indicate it is more than just an annoyance to them that they are planning on quashing.
We'll see I suppose. But the data on this one points to something with significance.
All I will say is, I truly hope you are correct and I hope I have to come in here and post how wrong I was. That is a fact. It would be incredible if somehow this passed in conference and was promoted to the docket. That being said … Im 99% certain this has all been weapons grade Hopium. A lot of people posted a lot of videos about this on the internet and didn't really think it through, or were intentionally preying on those of us praying for some kind of miracle to save our Republic.
I could be wrong, but my two cents....After the '20 election when there was a lot of hope that the SC would fix the fraud I thought they probably wouldn't, because it was too early.
To this day my thinking is that the election fraud was allowed to succeed (and that means SC didn't interfere) so DJT could be out of the picture while the Dems ran wild destroying the country right out in the open with everyone watching. If the SC or military would have interfered after the election the country would have been torn, and civil war could actually have been a real possibility. I believe intervention by the SC or military will not happen until we've hit the precipice and people are united and ready to demand change.
I think you are right. And I think we are still a long ways off from when "we've hit the precipice and people are united".
And everyone said, “military is the only way..”
This is the correct response. Nothing will come of this case, the USSC is not about to toss every elected official. Just the fact that people believe this will happen is shocking and disheartening. This is why we aren't winning anything.