The author CLEARLY stated that no other news outlet had reported on it. Here it is: "But with “national emergency” language added to the second submission of the petition it begs the question relating to the alternative news outlets, such as Zero Hedge, Unz.com, Breitbart, and The Gateway Pundit failing to cover this story—as of this writing Monday at 12 noon—that resides in the public domain"
I disagree. The author posited two scenarios, which are plausible. Begone, doomer!
The author CLEARLY stated that no other news outlet had reported on it. Here it is: "But with “national emergency” language added to the second submission of the petition it begs the question relating to the alternative news outlets, such as Zero Hedge, Unz.com, Breitbart, and The Gateway Pundit failing to cover this story—as of this writing Monday at 12 noon—that resides in the public domain"
That is a false statement, hence shoddy work.