If you consider yourself 'Awakened', you should be familiar with this pending SCOTUS case.
(americanmediaperiscope.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. This isn't even hitting any blogs because it's likely garbage. There are plenty of lawfags who could step up here to trumpet what this is, and, better, the chances of it being anything at all. No one is stepping up. Why? Likely because it's crap. Again.
I'm an attorney. I looked at some of the procedural history and, while I have not made an exhaustive search, I have read a few of the rulings in this case.
On January 6, 2022 this case was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court ruled that he did not have standing, and that the government has not waived sovereign immunity.
Brunson appealed this ruling, and the answer stayed the same. The most recent ruling was this month actually.
Looks like a nothingburger.
I will happily look more into it if anyone can point to something to the contrary. But this is why I don't trust these blogs. The last point especially in the blog, that "If the justices don't vote in favor, they may be charged with treason" is especially ridiculous. Absolute fantasyland.
Last, there is nothing to suggest that SCOTUS will accept cert in this case. Extremely unlikely.
Thanks, lawfagAnon. I rest my case. More smoke being blown up our collective asses.