1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your bad interpretation of federalism isn't law. Read about preemption.

12
DavoutNey 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hickory dickory dock

Hillary, Huma, Barack

Hillary lied while Obama spied

As long as she won, they'd walk

1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +1 / -0

No state can pass a law that shields them categorically from federal executive action. Maybe it would shield against some, but it's pure politics to say this thing is waterproof.

1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, it certainly appears like a good thing. But the obvious downside is that federal law can preempt this very easily. Basically any law Congress passes can supersede if they want using the interstate commerce clause.

2
DavoutNey 2 points ago +3 / -1

I understand it's topical, but is anyone else sick of all the Elon Musk news? The dude is deep state. I miss the days of Q decodes - this is turning into just another conservative news site.

3
DavoutNey 3 points ago +3 / -0

100%

Inversion is the hallmark of Satan. Good is evil, evil is good, consume now and produce never, men are women, etc.

It's like the last days of sodom and gomorrah

4
DavoutNey 4 points ago +4 / -0

They definitely were not verified

-1
DavoutNey -1 points ago +1 / -2

No. There is not. It's really sad that the Q community has devolved into this sovcit nonsense. It used to be a really sharp board with great insight. I'm an attorney and see this crap more and more on this board.

1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +1 / -0

You came across like a real douche. You should apologize

0
DavoutNey 0 points ago +1 / -1

Avian flu knocked out a bunch of chickens - so price of eggs drastically increased.

I used to have my own chickens and get 12-14 a day. Wish I still did.

1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +3 / -2

The idea they would ever accept cert on this absolute nutjob fringe case is laughable. Call me a shill, whatever. Don't give a shit.

Anyone thinking this case will do anything has no clue.

1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now that qagg is down, I'm using qanon.pub and I don't know how to search for a specific post. Help?

16
DavoutNey 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's a tough line I imagine to combat the intentionally provocative posts that are meant to demoralize and the earnest users who post their legitimate concerns. But I agree that this forum tends to go too hard on those who criticize.

1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably sent out a unique email to each employee that looked the same as ones others received. Pretty sure this is how Bill Gates caught some employees leaking at Microsoft

0
DavoutNey 0 points ago +1 / -1

Also, he is petitioning to appear before SCOTUS pro se. So in the extremely unlikely event SCOTUS actually grants cert, he will not have an attorney. Only him. And he will doubtless be spewing pseudo-legal jibberish that is straight from a sovereign citizen handbook. The man is going to make us look like morons if he gets a platform

1
DavoutNey 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was dismissed earlier this year, appealed, and then the appeals court affirmed the dismissal. So Brunson lost. He has petitioned SCOTUS for review, but SCOTUS has not granted cert (agreed to hear the case) and it's very very unlikely they will. So, it's a nothingburger.

10
DavoutNey 10 points ago +12 / -2

Boy the level of "proof" sure has declined in this forum.

How does this prove anything?

The idea behind short range missiles is to prevent Ukraine from attacking deep into Russian territory and thus provoke a wider conflict, i.e., "The US is directly involved in strikes on Russian territory".

3
DavoutNey 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ye is absolutely the most unreliable person in the world. No chance he is helping Trump. Intentionally, at least.

view more: Next ›