First Remdesivir Wrongful Death Lawsuit In Nevada: unnecessary medical treatment, no informed consent. - The Great Awakening

First Remdesivir Wrongful Death Lawsuit In Nevada: unnecessary medical treatment, no informed consent. (thenevadaglobe.com) 🤡 FUTURE 🤡

posted 1 year ago by corrbrick 1 year ago by corrbrick +390 / -0

EXCLUSIVE: Gilbert and Chattah File First Remdesivir Wrongful Death Lawsuit In Nevada - Nevada Globe

Reno Attorney Joey Gilbert and Las Vegas Attorney Sigal Chattah have filed the first Remdesivir wrongful death lawsuit (see below) in Nevada on behalf of

50 comments

50 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (50)

sorted by:

▲ 37 ▼

– corrbrick [S] 37 points 1 year ago +37 / -0

The Sparks Family Hospital, Northern Nevada Medical center, doctors and individuals are named in the complaint:

Deceased was prescribed Ivermectin and HCQ.
Hospital staff were instructed that under no circumstances was patient to be administered Remdesivir.
Staff said that they would comply with patient’s requests but that he could not be given the HCQ or Ivermectin because it was against hospital protocols.
Doctor ordered Remdesivir despite objections.
Patient was given Remdesivir and died of renal and respiratory failure a week later.
Unethical and a violation of Nevada laws, to administer an unnecessary medical treatment.
Unethical and a violation of Nevada laws, to administer a medical treatment without informed consent.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 15 ▼

– dty6 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

so glad to read this!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 9 ▼

– corrbrick [S] 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

Seems like a no brainer to me. But might want to put that champagne back in the fridge for now.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– Bidensbrain2020 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

The problem with this suit is that the PREP act gives the hospital immunity from liability as long as the follow the protocol. I'm not sure how to get around that, unless that provision of the act was somehow found unconstitutional?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– corrbrick [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

There may be conflicts with other laws/regulations like the patients bill of rights that can be leveraged.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q