I'd say this things has some serious balls, and could run. Simple case, simple complaint.
Factually speaking, like the document says: the complaint is uncontestable. These events are factual and established.
The "respondents" failed to investigate witnessed and sworn testimony of election fraud, contrary to their oaths of office.
Legally speaking, anything touched by fraud is invalid.
As such, the "respondents" are all party to the fraud and on its face, guilty of treason against their oath and the Constitution.
The consequences of that action, as outlined in the constitution: death, removal from office and permanent ineligibility for future office, jail time, and a fine of not less than $10,000.
Simple. Devastating. Awesome. 1st Amendment guarantees citizens the right of redress of grievances. I hope this thing burns this dirty and corrupt house of cards to ashes, so it can be rebuilt with the founders' designs in mind.
I'd say this things has some serious balls, and could run. Simple case, simple complaint.
Factually speaking, like the document says: the complaint is uncontestable. These events are factual and established.
The consequences of that action, as outlined in the constitution: death, removal from office and permanent ineligibility for future office, jail time, and a fine of not less than $10,000.
Simple. Devastating. Awesome. 1st Amendment guarantees citizens the right of redress of grievances. I hope this thing burns this dirty and corrupt house of cards to ashes, so it can be rebuilt with the founders' designs in mind.