Did you read the book?? IMHO it was the story of a brilliant, eccentric man who questioned everything and adhered to the scientific principle. You may not like him, but he led a life of adventure. We should all try to be like that...
Yes, I read it back in the 1980s. It was a gift from the Tau Beta Pi Honor Society for admission in their society. There's little to nothing I remember of it though. I regret to say, I recall it being rather boorish.
Thanks, by the number of down votes I received, I wonder what ever happened to respecting the other person's opinion? It seems I have no right to take a different direction from the herd mentality and take a different path? Wow, get along lil' doggies. There's only one path. Now, take it!
The down-votes for my opinion is amazing. It seems I have no right to take a different direction from the herd and take a different path? Wow, get along lil' doggies. There's only one path. Now, take it!
So you're the down-voter. I suppose it is your right to do so, but definitely not for your premise though. I thank you for responding. However, unfortunately your response sits at the very bottom of Graham's Hierarchy of Argument. 'Name calling' is pathetic and goes against the rules. GAW strives for its members to be at the upper level of this hierarchy. I suggest you read and understand them.
You mentioned Feynman was "one of mainstream's darlings". It wouldn't be for the same reason Carl Sagan, Albert Einstein, or even a Amy Schumer or Seth Rogan are promoted? A colleague of mine worked several years with Carl Sagan and said he is a "big fake", an "actor" who stole the headlines of the work others did. He was never even involved in the projects. He too publicly was endeared by mainstream television because of his ((karma))).
We are the news. Not the lying propaganda mainstream. A long time ago, decades ago before 'Q' made publicity, I was discerning "mainstream darlings". Feynman was one of them to which I questioned his promotion and his celebritiness.
Quite right. "Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman!" I was never 'big' on Richard Feynman.
Did you read the book?? IMHO it was the story of a brilliant, eccentric man who questioned everything and adhered to the scientific principle. You may not like him, but he led a life of adventure. We should all try to be like that...
Yes, I read it back in the 1980s. It was a gift from the Tau Beta Pi Honor Society for admission in their society. There's little to nothing I remember of it though. I regret to say, I recall it being rather boorish.
Fair enough....
Thanks, by the number of down votes I received, I wonder what ever happened to respecting the other person's opinion? It seems I have no right to take a different direction from the herd mentality and take a different path? Wow, get along lil' doggies. There's only one path. Now, take it!
The down-votes for my opinion is amazing. It seems I have no right to take a different direction from the herd and take a different path? Wow, get along lil' doggies. There's only one path. Now, take it!
So you're the down-voter. I suppose it is your right to do so, but definitely not for your premise though. I thank you for responding. However, unfortunately your response sits at the very bottom of Graham's Hierarchy of Argument. 'Name calling' is pathetic and goes against the rules. GAW strives for its members to be at the upper level of this hierarchy. I suggest you read and understand them.
You mentioned Feynman was "one of mainstream's darlings". It wouldn't be for the same reason Carl Sagan, Albert Einstein, or even a Amy Schumer or Seth Rogan are promoted? A colleague of mine worked several years with Carl Sagan and said he is a "big fake", an "actor" who stole the headlines of the work others did. He was never even involved in the projects. He too publicly was endeared by mainstream television because of his ((karma))).
We are the news. Not the lying propaganda mainstream. A long time ago, decades ago before 'Q' made publicity, I was discerning "mainstream darlings". Feynman was one of them to which I questioned his promotion and his celebritiness.
The interview is probably still on YouTube. Literally, you will laugh.