Didn't help you. Einstein only made some small corrections for special cases. But that still is a theory of Gravity. You weren't particular. Einstein's contribution is still a matter of controversy, but Newton's is quite solid.
It would be more accurate to say that best fitting the physical phenomena constitutes "proof" of a theory. (In Newton's day and up to the 20th century, there was no knowledge or observation of relativistic effects.) If not so, please explain without pettifogging.
It is pretty clear that you have no idea what to say about gravity, since you have refused to put your cards on the table.
Didn't help you. Einstein only made some small corrections for special cases. But that still is a theory of Gravity. You weren't particular. Einstein's contribution is still a matter of controversy, but Newton's is quite solid.
It would be more accurate to say that best fitting the physical phenomena constitutes "proof" of a theory. (In Newton's day and up to the 20th century, there was no knowledge or observation of relativistic effects.) If not so, please explain without pettifogging.
It is pretty clear that you have no idea what to say about gravity, since you have refused to put your cards on the table.