Nick Fuentes Sounds a Lot Like These Prominent Conservatives
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Didn't help you. Einstein only made some small corrections for special cases. But that still is a theory of Gravity. You weren't particular. Einstein's contribution is still a matter of controversy, but Newton's is quite solid.
It would be more accurate to say that best fitting the physical phenomena constitutes "proof" of a theory. (In Newton's day and up to the 20th century, there was no knowledge or observation of relativistic effects.) If not so, please explain without pettifogging.
It is pretty clear that you have no idea what to say about gravity, since you have refused to put your cards on the table.
You haven't made any "point." All you've done is proclaim a stupid denial. I only put "proof" in quotation marks (not italicized) to indicate I was talking about the definition of a word.
You are no more than the pre-schooler who sits under a tree, demanding that gravity is "not real." You are literally incomprehensible. Everyone is aware of the manifestations of gravity, even if they are not aware of the theory that explains it (successfully for 400 years) or all the less usual manifestations. You don't have any fault with the theory. You certainly cannot deny that gravity exists and is explained by the theory. What you you have? "Wah! Gravity is not real!"
Please put up, or shut up.
It works. You haven't made any point at all. You've just ranted against it. And you don't know the difference between a hypothesis and a theory, so don't expect you have any credibility with me.