I think Musk is right about AI . . . it's among the few technologies that might easily bring an end to us even without malice from those creating and wielding it.

I also think Musk is genuine in his positive intentions for Neuralink.

But high technologies are always dangerous. Doesn't mean we shouldn't pursue them, but we really MUST be smart about it, and not just left-brain-logic smart.

BTW, if you've never read Bill Joy's famous The Future Doesn't Need Us in Wired (from 2000), it's still, well, thought-provoking.

The 21st-century technologies—genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics (GNR)—are so powerful that they can spawn whole new classes of accidents and abuses. Most dangerously, for the first time, these accidents and abuses are widely within the reach of individuals or small groups. They will not require large facilities or rare raw materials. Knowledge alone will enable the use of them.

Thus we have the possibility not just of weapons of mass destruction but of knowledge-enabled mass destruction (KMD), this destructiveness hugely amplified by the power of self-replication.

I think it is no exaggeration to say we are on the cusp of the further perfection of extreme evil, an evil whose possibility spreads well beyond that which weapons of mass destruction bequeathed to the nation-states, on to a surprising and terrible empowerment of extreme individuals.

My brain could use some serious defragging. I'm pretty sure I don't need the phone numbers from 50 years ago of now-dead relatives..joking. But no, anything meant for good..if it can be used for evil then evil WILL find a way to get control of it.