Consider this - if we are "watching a movie" - and we've been told that "trust wray"...
Perhaps the plan has been walking Wray and Barr into the defendant seat - posed as "bad guys" for the normies to see as such.
Therefore, if to the normies these two are "bad guys" - or at least not on team Patriot at the surface level...
What Wray and Barr say now can point to and uncover the swamp around them - and they don't look Biased, in fact, quite the opposite - to the normies...
If that was part of this movie plan... hot damn - what a maneuver!
I don't think it's that complicated to be honest. We know Trump is a stable genius so why appoint people or keep people in position of power who are bad?
Because would we know the names if he did shed light on them?
I know the link to Q's posts says to trust but the more that comes out the more I'm convinced that was disinfo. I know the big names and have known them for a long time as I think most of did even before this started BUT I would not know who half these "other" people are if it weren't for Trump bringing them into the spotlight showing how much control they do in fact have behind the scenes.
Something that doesn't sit right with me is the whole "Disinfo is necessary" Q drop being applied to what Q has told us.
If we apply that rule to Q's drops - then how do we understand what is misinfo and what is not?
If we don't know what is misinfo, then how do we know which puzzle pieces are red herrings and which are not?
If some are red herrings, then that would cause the community (the digital soldiers) to waste a lot of time and energy - something that sounds deadly in a state of warfare.
However, if we apply "disinfo is necessary" to what we see happen out in "the world" - then it all makes a lot of sense in the perspective of "everything we're seeing is in the theatre of warfare" - Disinfo IS absolutely vital in that way and only helps us.
If WE understand that some of what we're seeing in the "out there" battlefield - then WE can prepare ourselves to be more Steady and less affected by Hype (something we've failed at!) - and thus not be so rocked when the rest of the world is rocked by the Theatre that has to happen to do battle in this information War.
I think we've been applying "Disinfo is necessary" to the wrong thing.
"I think we've been applying "Disinfo is necessary" to the wrong thing."
Perfectly said! I think we have to apply our critical thinking to understand it. So if we know Trump is a smart guy and that he is trying to shed light on the bad actors, then Trust Wray, Trust Sessions and whoever else after watchiing this unfold, we can assume is disinfo.
We have to look at the entire picture and not cherry pick or guess what is disinfo and what is not, because we could say it's all disinfo but as we watch it unfold and remember Q's drops, we can start seeing the forrest through the trees.
Consider this - if we are "watching a movie" - and we've been told that "trust wray"...
Perhaps the plan has been walking Wray and Barr into the defendant seat - posed as "bad guys" for the normies to see as such.
Therefore, if to the normies these two are "bad guys" - or at least not on team Patriot at the surface level...
What Wray and Barr say now can point to and uncover the swamp around them - and they don't look Biased, in fact, quite the opposite - to the normies...
If that was part of this movie plan... hot damn - what a maneuver!
I don't think it's that complicated to be honest. We know Trump is a stable genius so why appoint people or keep people in position of power who are bad?
Because would we know the names if he did shed light on them?
I know the link to Q's posts says to trust but the more that comes out the more I'm convinced that was disinfo. I know the big names and have known them for a long time as I think most of did even before this started BUT I would not know who half these "other" people are if it weren't for Trump bringing them into the spotlight showing how much control they do in fact have behind the scenes.
Yeah - I hear you.
Something that doesn't sit right with me is the whole "Disinfo is necessary" Q drop being applied to what Q has told us.
If we apply that rule to Q's drops - then how do we understand what is misinfo and what is not?
If we don't know what is misinfo, then how do we know which puzzle pieces are red herrings and which are not?
If some are red herrings, then that would cause the community (the digital soldiers) to waste a lot of time and energy - something that sounds deadly in a state of warfare.
However, if we apply "disinfo is necessary" to what we see happen out in "the world" - then it all makes a lot of sense in the perspective of "everything we're seeing is in the theatre of warfare" - Disinfo IS absolutely vital in that way and only helps us.
If WE understand that some of what we're seeing in the "out there" battlefield - then WE can prepare ourselves to be more Steady and less affected by Hype (something we've failed at!) - and thus not be so rocked when the rest of the world is rocked by the Theatre that has to happen to do battle in this information War.
I think we've been applying "Disinfo is necessary" to the wrong thing.
"I think we've been applying "Disinfo is necessary" to the wrong thing."
Perfectly said! I think we have to apply our critical thinking to understand it. So if we know Trump is a smart guy and that he is trying to shed light on the bad actors, then Trust Wray, Trust Sessions and whoever else after watchiing this unfold, we can assume is disinfo.
We have to look at the entire picture and not cherry pick or guess what is disinfo and what is not, because we could say it's all disinfo but as we watch it unfold and remember Q's drops, we can start seeing the forrest through the trees.