Since it appears there are efforts to memory-hole this existing, here are some proofs:
https://youtu.be/AG9on3BjYck?t=11100 a live stream where the post in question is shown, prior to its deletion. The email address is in the lower part of the image in the post, that has the text 'dorsey sent a her a copy of my substack article blasting the incident'
Doing a search for this text shows all the sites that archived the whole thread, including the post that was deleted. One example is:
With the damaging nature of what was NOT deleted, you might well wonder why one referencing a clear pedo connection to @jack merited special treatment and an attempt at a coverup.
Jack Dorseys email address used that domain, as revealed in one of the tweet in the 'leak' sequence from Matt Taibbi. One he later deleted..
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZX85XVua/pizzagate-jack-dorseys-private-e/c/
Thank you. So many moving parts, it’s hard to keep up. Things are moving fast. This is wild.
Since it appears there are efforts to memory-hole this existing, here are some proofs:
https://youtu.be/AG9on3BjYck?t=11100 a live stream where the post in question is shown, prior to its deletion. The email address is in the lower part of the image in the post, that has the text 'dorsey sent a her a copy of my substack article blasting the incident'
Doing a search for this text shows all the sites that archived the whole thread, including the post that was deleted. One example is:
https://www.shacknews.com/article/133342/matt-taibbis-twitter-files-peel-back-the-curtain-on-moderation-bias-at-social-media-platform
You can see from the link here (confirmed by the other archive sites) that the deleted post in question is this one:
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598845423979884544
With the damaging nature of what was NOT deleted, you might well wonder why one referencing a clear pedo connection to @jack merited special treatment and an attempt at a coverup.