You charge that I'm a tax collector, as if that would somehow be an insult.
Yup, it is. Tax Collector. Consider yourself insulted.
Taking others property under threat is wrong, period. Time to re-start the tar and feathering of your mindset.
So let's play out the hypothetical of abolishing the IRS. Then who collects taxes for the federal government?
YOU have brought us full circle to my original point you absolute regard.
Please explain how the federal goverment was funded (collected taxes) before the IRS was created...I'll wait... (I.E. Who and How were taxes ever collected if their was no IRS in existance pre 16th.)
Your entire arguement has been "Eliminating the IRS is foolish, and anyone who would put forth such an idea is a moron" My question to you since the start has been "SOME MECHANISM WAS IN PLACE TO COLLECT REVENUE BEFORE THE IRS EVER EXISTED"
Im done arguing with someone who ignores logic, argues semantics, shills for statism and collectivism, all while ignoring the salient points I have pointed out.
To put it bluntly, gtfo commie. Limited goverment is the best goverment. Please continue your arguements for more goverment, k thanks.
Yup, it is. Tax Collector. Consider yourself insulted.
Taking others property under threat is wrong, period. Time to re-start the tar and feathering of your mindset.
YOU have brought us full circle to my original point you absolute regard.
Your entire arguement has been "Eliminating the IRS is foolish, and anyone who would put forth such an idea is a moron" My question to you since the start has been "SOME MECHANISM WAS IN PLACE TO COLLECT REVENUE BEFORE THE IRS EVER EXISTED"
Im done arguing with someone who ignores logic, argues semantics, shills for statism and collectivism, all while ignoring the salient points I have pointed out.
To put it bluntly, gtfo commie. Limited goverment is the best goverment. Please continue your arguements for more goverment, k thanks.