Arguments for/against Mike Lindell for the RNC chair?
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
I wanted to get an honest, unbiased (in comparison to Truth Social) analysis on the pros and cons of having Mike Lindell given the RNC chair over the other candidates gunning for Ronna McDaniel's position. Truth Social is going all in on Mike Lindell, but when I read up on their reasons why, it seema that it is more out of emotional bias than any actual calculated reason. I would think PDW will have the same problem and that all other networks will exhibit the exact opposite reaction..which leads to here.
With that being said, what are pros and/or cons of letting Mike Lindell have the RNC Chair?
It's usually somebody with extreme campaign experience. The nuts and bolts of a campaign. Not the talk that you hear not the signs in the yards and not the rallies. It is raising money and using campaign strategy and 'knowing the electorate everywhere', and the electoral process.
With that said I like Mike. There are actually four good candidates, two male and two females.
The rules are you must have one male and one female as chair and co-chair. So however this goes we have two good females and two good males so far. So someone will be the co-chair as well.
We should be supportive of them all because someone's going to get the number two slot.