I see now that your theological and doctrinal understandings differ from mine. For example, tares among the wheat as relating to the final judgment vs. the Tribulation. Even the subject of taking the Lord’s name in vain as relating to our entire discussion.
You and me are obviously on polar opposites regarding the current state of humanity (politically, religiously, and the nature of Satan’s work behind that). We differ as well on our expectations of the good guys vs. the bad guys, the white hats vs. the black hats, Trump/Q/Q+ and the patriots vs. the swamp/the cabal (intimately the devil and what is granted to him until the final judgment). Wherever your beliefs fall within the spectrum of the patriots/Trump/Q etc., you have an expectation of victory that does not comport with the Bible. I’ve done what I can to lay out how and why that is the case as I see it in Scripture and in reality.
Where am I going with this? Well, you seem to have the impulse of taking the lowest road and accusing me of taking the Lord’s name in vain. I am not convinced you truly believe that. You wrongfully accuse me, once again, of “invoking God to win political arguments.” But when I tell you that the victory you expect is not coming, and then I qualify that with God’s revelation of the future time to come (when Satan’s power in the world system of evil is defeated once and for all), that’s not using the Lord’s name in vain. I’m not politically motivated… but the nature of the discussion heavily involves politics and religion as they relate to the coming Tribulation and what God has ordained to happen to the world (including trumpets and bowl judgments).
Either you accuse me in ignorance, or you do it in defiance. But I’m convinced, either way, you do it because I’m obligated to be labeled as a black-piller. That’s not much different than two Christian’s debating sovereign election and free will and then one accusing the other of not being saved.
The underlying problem as I see it is this: You’re being petty because I “defected,” and you think I should be banned because of it. How are you much different than a leftist or a raging Democrat when your belief system is challenged? Like Dems on Twitter, are you wanting me to be banned? When did I wound you? When was I malicious?
I want serious and meaningful discourse. If you do not, then just say so.
Here is an article on the subject of “taking the Lord’s name in vain”: https://www.gotquestions.org/Lords-name-vain.html
I see now that your theological and doctrinal understandings differ from mine. For example, tares among the wheat as relating to the final judgment vs. the Tribulation. Even the subject of taking the Lord’s name in vain as relating to our entire discussion.
You and me are obviously on polar opposites regarding the current state of humanity (politically, religiously, and the nature of Satan’s work behind that). We differ as well on our expectations of the good guys vs. the bad guys, the white hats vs. the black hats, Trump/Q/Q+ and the patriots vs. the swamp/the cabal (intimately the devil and what is granted to him until the final judgment). Wherever your beliefs fall within the spectrum of the patriots/Trump/Q etc., you have an expectation of victory that does not comport with the Bible. I’ve done what I can to lay out how and why that is the case as I see it in Scripture and in reality.
Where am I going with this? Well, you seem to have the impulse of taking the lowest road and accusing me of taking the Lord’s name in vain. I am not convinced you truly believe that. You wrongfully accuse me, once again, of “invoking God to win political arguments.” But when I tell you that the victory you expect is not coming, and then I qualify that with God’s revelation of the future time to come (when Satan’s power in the world system of evil is defeated once and for all), that’s not using the Lord’s name in vain. I’m not politically motivated… but the nature of the discussion heavily involves politics and religion as they relate to the coming Tribulation and what God has ordained to happen to the world (including trumpets and bowl judgments).
Either you accuse me in ignorance, or you do it in defiance. But I’m convinced, either way, you do it because I’m obligated to be labeled as a black-piller. That’s not much different than two Christian’s debating sovereign election and free will and then one accusing the other of not being saved.
The underlying problem as I see it is this: You’re being petty because I “defected,” and you think I should be banned because of it. How are you much different than a leftist or a raging Democrat when your belief system is challenged? Like Dems on Twitter, are you wanting me to be banned? When did I wound you? When was I malicious? I want serious and meaningful discourse. If you do not, then just say so.