She sure is and it doesn't look good. Her "defense" is non-existent as her attorneys have advised her to stay quiet. That's almost always a bad sign that she has something to hide and she's hoping for a LEGAL way to slip out of it.

By all appearances she bought a $3.5 Million home in Florida with AFLD money which was not her own. That's the primary allegation. The fact that she can't step right up and say "that was my money and my money alone" due to her attorney's gag order is a very bad look. Is she going to argue that was the money she had coming to her anyway as if to say "I just pulled the $3.5M out of the business account early before they had a chance to distribute it to my bank account because I wanted this house and needed to move quickly? That seems like the only argument she can make at this stage.

Jane Ruby talked the other night about how the services the AFLD are providing are slow, lack-luster and in some cases have gone unfulfilled and that Jane has received so many complaints about the organization that she has stopped recommending them for the past year. They've been outsourcing Ivermectin, HCQ and other products to 3rd parties who are sloppy, include medical advice brochures urging the recipient gets jabbed, etc. etc.

Net-Net - There are lots of reasons to be suspicious of AFLD, and by association now, Simone Gold as well. Sure they did some good and provided a service and access to these drugs where there was a gap. But it sounds like profiteering and greed have, once again, taken precedence over what initially began as a worthy cause.

I'm all about presumed innocence until proven guilty, but the actions of Simone Gold are looking sketchier by the day since she won't directly and openly respond to the allegations from her business partners.