But after listening to Loy Brunson’s story of this case, during which he talks about how curiously eager the Supreme Court clerk seemed to be to have him get his case to them, quickly, with all outstanding questions addressed, it truly seems as if this case is being shepherded in from above. It certainly seems that someone, or someones, at the Supreme Court are particularly eager to receive this case, promptly and perfectly.
I’m not an expert on the Supreme Court, or experienced in predicting their actions based on reading legal tea leaves. And I only have Loy Brunson’s word (and the fact that this case made it to the Supreme Court) to go on here, but he seems genuine and earnest. To me, though, although there’s undeniably a huge chance it’s a nothing burger, it just seems like this case could be providential, and monumental.
All that means is that they don't think it's worth their time to argue against certifying the case, i.e. they don't expect the petition to survive conference regardless.
That just tells me the SC is going to dismiss the case. When the put this case in they did not have the dismiss option but were asked by the secretary of the SC to add it in. Thats how I read that.
Anyone who thinks the SC to make a ruling that would change the face of our government this much is fooling themselves. The judiciary is part of the problem....
For the doubters, I totally get your skepticism.
But after listening to Loy Brunson’s story of this case, during which he talks about how curiously eager the Supreme Court clerk seemed to be to have him get his case to them, quickly, with all outstanding questions addressed, it truly seems as if this case is being shepherded in from above. It certainly seems that someone, or someones, at the Supreme Court are particularly eager to receive this case, promptly and perfectly.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/wendy-bell-radio-podcast/id1647025876?i=1000588909791
I’m not an expert on the Supreme Court, or experienced in predicting their actions based on reading legal tea leaves. And I only have Loy Brunson’s word (and the fact that this case made it to the Supreme Court) to go on here, but he seems genuine and earnest. To me, though, although there’s undeniably a huge chance it’s a nothing burger, it just seems like this case could be providential, and monumental.
<whistles>
All that means is that they don't think it's worth their time to argue against certifying the case, i.e. they don't expect the petition to survive conference regardless.
if they ignore it, it will go away.
That just tells me the SC is going to dismiss the case. When the put this case in they did not have the dismiss option but were asked by the secretary of the SC to add it in. Thats how I read that.
Anyone who thinks the SC to make a ruling that would change the face of our government this much is fooling themselves. The judiciary is part of the problem....
THEY DID IN 2000 BUSH v GORE. Why not now? Precedence has already been established.
They're just going to ignore it. What are YOU going to do about it?