Thanks. Had never heard this term. I will remember it.
The biggest issue though is not just asking for evidence, but asking for evidence only from a source THEY approve of. The real problem is you can't even begin a dialog. There is no factual canon, acceptable to both parties, that would allow a logical discussion to take place.
They want to quote statistics from the CDC and radical left university studies, and I want to discuss evidence from sources they consider "debunked." Neither one of us believes the evidence of the other, so what is the point of the discussion?
Thanks. Had never heard this term. I will remember it.
The biggest issue though is not just asking for evidence, but asking for evidence only from a source THEY approve of. The real problem is you can't even begin a dialog. There is no factual canon, acceptable to both parties, that would allow a logical discussion to take place.
They want to quote statistics from the CDC and radical left university studies, and I want to discuss evidence from sources they consider "debunked." Neither one of us believes the evidence of the other, so what is the point of the discussion?
I wonder if Reddit has a term for that.
Let me take a guess - "redditing"
Irreconcilable differences