Occultists, writers, and occultic writers have reasonably postulated (from a myopic point of view) that Christianity is based in lies and that it actually uses far more ancient occultic pagan symbols, names, and concepts, obscured by the knowledge gap between the "profane" and the "initiate", and that in the modern example of Christianity the practices performed are actually ancient occultic rituals.
While I think that it is partly true, that Christ/Chrestos is not a term specifically for Yeshua and comes from Oracleist temple initiate tradition and that modern Christianity does use pagan rites and older concepts, I offer a rebuttal to the idea that it nullifies the sacrifice of Yeshua to take away the sins of the world.
I think that rather than the salvation of Christ being a lie because of the usage of pagan symbols in it's practice, it's actually the opposite, in that it's actually Yeshua's sacrifice using worldly (the world being the domain of Satan) symbols so that salvation from sin through Yeshua's sacrifice can manifest itself in those who profanely use said symbols and rites.
It is a fulfillment of Yeshua's practice on Earth of dining with Tax Collectors and Sinners. That is; it brings the healing to the sick who by their fleshly nature will always be partially dominated by the symbols of the world. Rather than nullifying it, it confirms that all can be saved from sinful nature.
For as far as I can tell, it is the only religion that dictates necessarily that one depart from sin, that there are codified acts of evil that can be and must be departed from.
Other religions talk about various states of enlightenment but make no effort to document the state of said enlightenment, or equate it with a specific set of rules of "goodness", and thus make no effort to dictate specific rules of "badness".
It is thus through the handing down of the Commandments to Moses that Israel's people were "chosen". Not by birthright or geneaology, over which many wars have been fought, but simply by the act of providing them with the "rules of goodness" which have formed the backbone of the healthier aspects of our profane society.
Thus, Christianity is the religion of becoming one with the Father by departing from sin, which uses ancient worldly symbols to appeal to the nature of the flesh, so that the flesh can open the door to the spirit.
Other religions practiced by the Egyptian/Masonic/Crowlean/Osirian sects see a unification of opposites into a third state of being as the door into enlightenment, but that enlightenment is the false enlightenment offered by the serpent to Eve, the knowledge of good AND evil synthesized into a being who thinks that they can now become God (the third state of being). This state of being is an ilusion, as the human is dominated by the World, the World is dominated by Satan, and Satan is dominated by God. God has no boundaries and is a law unto Himself.
Many will try lead you from the path of Yeshua and thus God, and will use such discussions to lead your mind into arguing against God, Yeshua the Messiah, and ultimately lead you into seeking gnosis elsewhere in avenues that do not conform to the core tenet of "Sin no more".
It is this core tenet that they tempt you into betraying. And as flesh dominated by the world, our viewpoint and ability to reason is limited, thus arguments that seem intellectual will often completely miss the spiritual core of it all in "Sin no more" and "Forgiveness for Sins already committed".
I've been thinking about this all morning in one form or another, and would like to discuss it with all of you. Debate and discussion is encouraged.
Question: To the best of YOUR knowledge, are there other religions and spiritual practices that necessitate the departure from sin?
Yeah I know, the hedge at the bottom of the garden or is it a shit wiping stick?
Keep your patronising cosmic confusion, its nothing but guru gabble.
Accept Jesus Christ or not, its your choice.
Your first sentence is vile and incomprehensible. If you don't like what was said, keep it to yourself. This is the way. By your act of judgment, you demonstrate you understand very little of the scripture you read. It's a terrible look and always puts "Christians" in a bad light. I wonder why?
I "accept Jesus Christ", but you and I have different definitions of who and what "Jesus Christ" is. You can thank the cabal for your present state of misunderstanding and confusion.
What, you don't believe the cabal subverted your understanding of scripture but somehow managed to subvert everything else in this realm?
Butthurt much?
Anyone who disagrees with you is a mind slave of the cabal, no question about it. Stop telling others what to think and who they should be, it puts satan in a bad light.
You have no idea what my relationship with Jesus Christ is at all so don't pretend you do, you say I don't understand much scripture, but why do you quote a book you don't believe in at all? You do not have the authority.
And as for my first sentence, you don't know very much about buddhist teachings I see. Google these phrases.
I look forward to your next outburst of demonic terminalogical inexactitudes.