What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
Um, this is ambiguous. Who is "they" here?
Cases can be docketed with the SC which means they are on a list for the SC to look at and decide whether or not they will hear the case. As far as I know, there has been no decision on that point yet, but maybe I'm wrong. The point, however, is that getting on the docket does not mean that the SC will hear the case. It's just a first step necessary for them to consider whether or not they will hear it.
The SC did not "push" this case in any way, did they? Or are you saying they delayed making a determination on whether they will hear it or not?
Either way, I am simply offering a response to why perhaps the frens on the board are not making as big a deal of this as you seem to think is warranted.
Loy Brunson said that the Clerk of the Supreme Court contacted them and gave them pointers on how to amend the case to make it more likely to succeed and asked them to speed up the process.
He explains it in this video; https://rumble.com/v1xi6vh-juan-o-savin-112722-video-b.html
Yes, I know that. And that's an encouraging sign, for sure.
But, it's on the docket. And the Clerk is not the Justices. We have to wait until Jan 6 to find out whether this will truly go ahead, or simply be set aside.
(I listened to the video all the way through 2 weeks ago.)