It is clear. The info needed is not on the page. It is elsewhere. One has to know the "history of ” . And that is not in that thread. Which is what I was inquiring toward. I wasn't sure I had the relevant info. I was correct. This is no affront to you although it may seem like it. Carry on.
Oh. Okay. I didn't realize. Are you like, checking my papers? Are you full on one of those? Or did you sense the tiniest bit of disagreement and are now ..., You know, like you said? We're in the same side. 😞
No, read again.
"It's a simple metric, if there's a history of whining and mocking, that's a good start."
Is that not clear?
Yea mate. I got it the first time. Totally clear.
It is clear. The info needed is not on the page. It is elsewhere. One has to know the "history of ” . And that is not in that thread. Which is what I was inquiring toward. I wasn't sure I had the relevant info. I was correct. This is no affront to you although it may seem like it. Carry on.
I've no idea what you are spewing. I'm going over all your history and deciding it it warrants dooming and hence banning.
Oh. Okay. I didn't realize. Are you like, checking my papers? Are you full on one of those? Or did you sense the tiniest bit of disagreement and are now ..., You know, like you said? We're in the same side. 😞
We're checking if you're a doomer.
So far, it's borderline.