Just joined at the end of it and the audio for us was really buffering a lot.
But the bottom line I got was that the hearing of the evidence and the motions to dismiss will occur December 21-22, divided evenly between plaintiff and defendants. I also heard (I think) that the signature evidence will be kept under seal, as required under AZ law for privacy or something.
If my understanding of this is off, would someone please correct??
BIG THANKS to RSBN for covering this and for The Gateway Pundit for alerting us to this.
Edit:
I did get to hear a bit of the discussion regarding the restriction of time to present, deliberate, and decide before the "transfer of power" is to occur (January , 2023??). It kinda stuck in my crawl a little that this "transfer of power" seemed to be more important (to the defendants and the judge) than the integrity of the election, it seemed to me.
Edit #2: Defendants used a word,"Dubious" during the discussion of the time to present evidence. I know what dubious means to me in plain English, but just what is the legal definition of "Dubious"?
Just joined at the end of it and the audio for us was really buffering a lot.
But the bottom line I got was that the hearing of the evidence and the motions to dismiss will occur December 21-22, divided evenly between plaintiff and defendants. I also heard (I think) that the signature evidence will be kept under seal, as required under AZ law for privacy or something.
If my understanding of this is off, would someone please correct??
BIG THANKS to RSBN for covering this and for The Gateway Pundit for alerting us to this.
Edit: I did get to hear a bit of the discussion regarding the restriction of time to present, deliberate, and decide before the "transfer of power" is to occur (January , 2023??). It kinda stuck in my crawl a little that this "transfer of power" seemed to be more important (to the defendants and the judge) than the integrity of the election, it seemed to me.
Edit #2: Defendants used a word,"Dubious" during the discussion of the time to present evidence. I know what dubious means to me in plain English, but just what is the legal definition of "Dubious"?